Jacob Carlborg , dans le message (digitalmars.D:174069), a écrit : > On 2012-08-02 10:15, Walter Bright wrote: > >> Worst case use an adapter range. > > And that is better than a plain string? > because its front method does not do any decoding.
- Re: std.d.lexer requirements Jacob Carlborg
- Re: std.d.lexer requirements Walter Bright
- Re: std.d.lexer requirements Jacob Carlborg
- Re: std.d.lexer requirements Walter Bright
- Re: std.d.lexer requirements Jonathan M Davis
- Re: std.d.lexer requirements Jonathan M Davis
- Re: std.d.lexer requirements Jacob Carlborg
- Re: std.d.lexer requirements Walter Bright
- Re: std.d.lexer requirements Christophe Travert
- Re: std.d.lexer requirements Jacob Carlborg
- Re: std.d.lexer requirements Christophe Travert
- Re: std.d.lexer requirements Jacob Carlborg
- Re: std.d.lexer requirements Christophe Travert
- Re: std.d.lexer requirements Walter Bright
- Re: std.d.lexer requirements Walter Bright
- Re: std.d.lexer requirements Tobias Pankrath
- Re: std.d.lexer requirements Walter Bright
- Re: std.d.lexer requirements Walter Bright
- Re: std.d.lexer requirements Jonathan M Davis
- Re: std.d.lexer requirements Walter Bright
- Re: std.d.lexer requirements deadalnix