On Saturday, 18 August 2012 at 20:22:59 UTC, Mehrdad wrote:
On Saturday, 18 August 2012 at 11:26:01 UTC, Peter Alexander wrote:In D, const without immutable is meaningless.lol, that was the whole point of this question... the whole point of Jon's example was to show it's not meaningless even without immutable. :)
Jon is right. If you can guarantee that there are no other references then const can provide some guarantees, but in general you don't know if there are other references.
