On Saturday, 18 August 2012 at 22:04:21 UTC, Peter Alexander
wrote:
On Saturday, 18 August 2012 at 20:22:59 UTC, Mehrdad wrote:
On Saturday, 18 August 2012 at 11:26:01 UTC, Peter Alexander
wrote:
In D, const without immutable is meaningless.
lol, that was the whole point of this question... the whole
point of Jon's example was to show it's not meaningless even
without immutable. :)
Jon is right. If you can guarantee that there are no other
references then const can provide some guarantees, but in
general you don't know if there are other references.
Right, most optimizations are not applicable to general cases.
