On Sunday, 19 August 2012 at 19:26:58 UTC, Jesse Phillips wrote:
On Saturday, 18 August 2012 at 11:26:01 UTC, Peter Alexander
wrote:
const on its own provides no guarantees, it just imposes
restrictions so that immutable can provide guarantees.
While in context with the original question this is fine, but I
do not like this use of guarantee.
What I mean is, const does provide guarantees by itself. And it
provides more than C++ because it is transitive and modifying a
const reference is undefined.
What guarantees does const provide on its own?
