On Sunday, October 07, 2012 11:43:21 Peter Alexander wrote: > On Saturday, 6 October 2012 at 21:19:58 UTC, Joseph Rushton > > Wakeling wrote: > > On 10/06/2012 10:59 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote: > >> Definitely not. *DSource* is dying, unfortunately, which has > >> lead some > >> people to assume the same of the rest of D. But no, D is going > >> very > >> strong, and has only been getting bigger. > > > > Might be worth placing some prominent message on DSource > > stating that it's being maintained to document all the D1 work > > and projects, but that the active work is now over at dlang.org? > > +1 > > Getting tired of people heading to dsource and assuming that D is > dead.
Isn't part of the problem that no one can get ahold of the person who runs it? At least, that's what I remember being discussed previously. It was my understanding that that's why we've never been able to get dsource cleaned up or really changed at all. - Jonathan M Davis