I would like to point out that Dave Struebel
and the Winlink Group are responsible for most of the QRM we enjoy on HF
from unattended Winlink
stations, especially around 14105 to 14110.
If Winlink, rather than spreading themselves out
all over the band, were to confine their operations to a narrower segment, ie
14072 to 14080, and below
14105, leaving the OLIVIA and other similar modes
some operating room, then it might be worthwhile getting involved with NTSD.
This doesn't have to be done by regulation, just a gentlemen's agreement would
suffice.
Like many hams, I have a pactor 1 TNC sitting doing
nothing, but don't want to make a bad situation worse . Until Winlink cleans up
it's act, I don't want to be any part of more QRM
John
VE5MU
----- Original Message -----
Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to 66.24.209.78 Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan policy discussion)
SPONSORED LINKS
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
|
- Re: [digitalradio] NTS and traffic handling and digital John Bradley
- Re: [digitalradio] NTS and traffic handling and digita... Chuck Mayfield
- Re: [digitalradio] NTS and traffic handling and digita... David Struebel
- Re: [digitalradio] NTS and traffic handling and di... John Bradley
- Re: [digitalradio] NTS and traffic handling an... Tim Gorman
- Re: [digitalradio] NTS and traffic handling an... David Struebel
- Re: [digitalradio] NTS and traffic handling and digita... Tim Gorman
- Re: [digitalradio] NTS and traffic handling and di... John Bradley
- Re: [digitalradio] NTS and traffic handling an... Danny Douglas
- Re: [digitalradio] NTS and traffic handlin... John Becker