|
never hear RTTY there, always just pactor.......
and usually P3
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2006 8:44
PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] NTS and
traffic handling and digital
If you use 14105 - 14110 your going to be bucking
heads with rtty ops. You might read Olivia thru that, but the rtty ops
wont enjoy it.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2006 9:39
PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] NTS and
traffic handling and digital
Excuse my ignorance, but why are we trying to
use 14105 to 14110 for OLIVIA and the other modes then?
Why are we not down between 14073 and 14080,
for example?
I am not up on the FCC rules, our country's
regulations would not prohibit Olivia and the like in that segment. It
doesn't make sense to beat each
other over the head with QRM........ and I
always thought Winlink was winlink, not several different
versions
John
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2006 12:34
PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] NTS and
traffic handling and digital
Please do not confuse the NTSD using the Winlink
Classic program with the
Winlink 2000 email system. All of the NTSD
Winlink Classic stations I connect
to stay within in the automatic
sub-bands as laid out in FCC regulations,
Part 97.221(b). These are:
14095-140995khz and 14100.5-14112khz. In fact, all
of the stations I
connect to on 20m are either at 14096khz or 14098khz. Some
other
stations may use other frequencies but these are the main
ones.
This is different from the Winlink 2000 email group which has
statons on such
frequencies as 14065, 14069, 14070, 14105, 14107, and
14109khz. Please note
that the frequencies between 14100.5khz and
14112khz *are* designated by the
FCC as being for automatic type
operation.
So if you want to get involved with handling NTS
messages instead of email
messages, getting involved with the NTSD
should not be an interference
problem.
Just as a plug - the
FCC has put out RM-11305 and RM-11306 out for public
comment. They
will both have significant impacts on digital users. Analyze
the
proposals carefully and MAKE COMMENTS TO THE FCC. Make your analyses
carefully, some impacts of the proposals could actually result in more
interference to digital operations instead of less.
tim
ab0wr
On Saturday 14 January 2006 16:45, John Bradley
wrote:
> I would like to point out that Dave Struebel and the
Winlink Group are
> responsible for most of the QRM we enjoy on HF
from unattended Winlink
> stations, especially around 14105 to
14110.
>
> If Winlink, rather than spreading themselves out
all over the band, were to
> confine their operations to a narrower
segment, ie 14072 to 14080, and
> below 14105, leaving the OLIVIA
and other similar modes some operating
> room, then it might be
worthwhile getting involved with NTSD. This doesn't
> have to be
done by regulation, just a gentlemen's agreement would
suffice.
>
> Like many hams, I have a pactor 1 TNC sitting
doing nothing, but don't want
> to make a bad situation worse .
Until Winlink cleans up it's act, I don't
> want to be any part of
more QRM
>
> John
> VE5MU
>
>
> -----
Original Message -----
> Subject: Re: [digitalradio] NTS
and traffic handling and digital
>
>
>
Winlink 2000 has solutions to many of the requirements that you
list.
> However in all cases until the computer calls and delivers
the message with
> an automated voice it still requires trained
operator at the delivery end.
> There is an active NTS digital
network but lacking in stations willing to
> either draw the traffic
off manaully or pass it on to other means of
> delivery. If anyone
is interested in joining NTSD either as a digital HF
> station or as
a keyboarder to remove traffic drop me an email and I can
> point
you in the right direction.
>
> Dave Struebel
WB2FTX Eastern Area Digital Cordinator- NTSD
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free
Edition.
Version: 7.0.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.18/230 - Release
Date: 1/14/06
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free
Edition.
Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.18/230 - Release Date:
1/14/2006
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free
Edition.
Version: 7.0.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.18/230 - Release Date:
1/14/06
Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org
Other areas of interest:
The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/
DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan policy discussion)
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
|
