The FCC missive is just that -- a missive; its not a regulation. No
requirement to prevent interference is present in 97.221.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, kd4e <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Then I am afraid that the author of the FCC missive re. this
> specific issue must be using a different English language
> dictionary than the rest of us.
>
> This text clearly states in common English language usage
> that the "control operator ... *must prevent* ... causing
> interference".
>
> What am I missing, please?
>
> "We do recognize the concerns of those who oppose the proposal on
> the basis of potential interference, and in response to these
> concerns we are limiting when automatic control can be employed.
> First, the control operator of the station that is connected to the
> automatically controlled station must prevent the automatically
> controlled station from causing interference."
>
>
> > Actually, Doc, those are expressly legal under 97.221. The FCC's
> > rationale (the URL for which I posted earlier) clearly
acknowledges
> > the potential for interference. They challenged us to find ways
to
> > mitigate this interference, but did not make interference
mitigation
> > a prerequisite to operation under 97.221.
> >
> > The demonstratrable failure to mitigate interference from
operation
> > on 97.221 makes a very strong case against the elimination of
> > constraints on semi-automatic operation. The primary constraint
I
> > would impose is "listen before you transmit"; in the absence of
> > that, "stay within these sub-bands".
> >
> > 73,
> >
> > Dave, AA6YQ
> >
> > --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, kd4e <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> And those are plainly illegal and always have been.
> >>
> >> As President Bush said to terrorists cynically proposing
> >> a "truce", "We don't negotiate with terrorists, we put
> >> them out of business."
> >>
> >> According to the FCC and Amateur Radio tradition we don't
> >> reward illegal ops with special band segments, we shut
> >> them down and reclaim the abused spectrum.
> >>
> >> ;-)
> >>
> >>> A reminder, John: the only automatic operations I would
confine
> >>> to "a small part of the band" are those whose software is
> > incapable
> >>> of listening before transmitting.
> >> --
> >> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >> Thanks! & 73, doc kd4e
> >>
> >> |_|___|_|
> >> | | & | |
> >> {|
> >> /\ {|
> >> / \ {|
> >> / \ {|
> >> / @ \ {|
> >> | |~_|~~~~|
> >> | -| | |
> >> ============\ # http://bibleseven.com/kd4e.html
> >> KD4E =====================================
> >> West Central Florida
> >>
> >> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to
Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org
> >
> > Other areas of interest:
> >
> > The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/
> > DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan
policy discussion)
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Thanks! & 73, doc kd4e
>
> |_|___|_|
> | | & | |
> {|
> /\ {|
> / \ {|
> / \ {|
> / @ \ {|
> | |~_|~~~~|
> | -| | |
> ============\ # http://bibleseven.com/kd4e.html
> KD4E =====================================
> West Central Florida
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org
Other areas of interest:
The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/
DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan policy discussion)
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
