KV9U wrote: > > I have not ever contacted anyone at FCC although I have contacted > ARRL staff for help on such things. Perhaps one could contact Bill > Cross, but it would be best if they have a clarification that is > released for public knowledge rather than to one individual or a > small group. > > Having said that, I personally have read the rules many, many times, > and parts are very clear. The ones that I felt were what reasonable > people would understand. It was Bonnie who disagreed. > > Nothing wrong with disagreeing, as long as you then explain why you > disagree. She has not been able to do that. This seems to be her > modus operandi based on previous interactions. And the reason is that > she really can not refute the current rules. > > 73, > > Rick, KV9U >
My impression is that Bonnie has an inflexible agenda: that Pactor II and III will continue to operate in auto or semi-auto modes. She claimed that the new regs permitted this, even as the FCC was publishing the errata adjustments. You will recall the "Pactor ... is OK" thread, which frankly I found somewhat jarring. Nothing wrong with Pactor; used to operate it myself, keyboard-to-keyboard. de Roger W6VZV
