My entry in the $10,000 prize hunt will be this wide or wider.  ;-)

Bonnie is,  as usual,  out in front of most other people's thinking, 
leading, goading, etc.   AB2KT and I have written the software defined 
radio code for SDR-1000 (and others) and we are working on the library 
code that will enable this.  It has been my interpretation of the rules, 
and the interpretation of all my low friends in high places in states 
that begin with a "C" , that it is in fact allowed (none willing to 
speak on the record).    As SDR working group chairman,  I have been 
actively pursuing these questions and goading development, both hardware 
and software.    All that is necessary to do this type of modem work in 
hardware will probably spring into existence "as if by magic" at Dayton 
in the SDR, TAPR, and HFPACK forums.  ;-).   We need buy in from the 
amateur community at large so lots of work needs to be done in the area 
of peaceful coexistence but without an exemplar to work with,  all you 
get is knee jerk reactions on all sides.  I will be providing the 
exemplar and aiding OTHERS to develop the networks.  I simply will not 
have the time to do this personally.  I challenge Bonnie, Walt, and 
others to take what comes and use it and figure out HOW it should be 
used.  As a scientist/engineer,  I will do the technical work, and aid 
the policy decisions, but will not make them.

Here are my current working plans.   OFDM,  ARBITRARY bandwidth,  
variable number of carriers,  variable baudrate,  BICM or Turbo Trellis 
coded modulation DESIGNED FOR the fading channel,  ARQ DESIGNED FOR THE 
ENVIRONMENT,  ......  and to provide this in a format that will allow us 
to be radio amateurs: EXPERIMENTATION to figure out the optimal settings 
and usable bandwidths.  But 18 kHz will NOT be the limitation in the 
software.  Antennas usable over large frequency ranges will be.   NVIS 
for this will be an important portion of this.  Frank and I have this 
goal of having credible "local area networks" that cover thousands of 
square miles for all sorts of noble purposes (Emergencies,  
infrastructure where none exists or is currently impossible, etc. )

There has been a tremendous volume of research, good work,  definitely 
applicable, which has been done in the last two decades.   It is kind of 
a shame that you need to have a book budget that is in the thousands of 
dollars to put together the library for this work since they are 
typically captured in usable form in these expensive books.  I am very 
fortunate to have this resource provided to me at work.  You can get the 
work in papers but it is usually so terse as to be difficult even to 
professionals with the necessary training.

Bonnie's leadership in ALE, prodding and poking both the developer and 
the users is a critical resource here.  ALE is absolutely required to 
make this resource usable in my opinion.  It will be an enabling 
technology in this along with the new SDR code is about to be sprung.   
The modem and open source ALE will follow after along with lots of new 
SDR capable hardware about the same time.

QRX

Bob
N4HY



Andrew O'Brien wrote:
> So, , what digital modes exist that are in the 12 to 20 kHz range
> could I use if I when and bought a SDR today ?
> Andy K3UK
>
> On 1/24/07, expeditionradio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>   
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> SDRs Open the Possibility for 18kHz Bandwidth HF Data
>> providing more robust communications and higher speed data.
>>
>> With new Software Defined Radio (SDR) transceivers that use
>> computer audio as the IF and DSP for filtering and modem,
>> wider bandwidths than the traditional 3kHz SSB transceivers
>> are possible.
>>
>> 12kHz or 20kHz BW is certainly within the range of SDRs.
>> This opens the possibility for some very fast and/or robust
>> HF digital modes that can take advantage of wider bandwidths
>> when needed, or could scale down and up in speed or bandwidth
>> depending upon propagation conditions and need to coexist and
>> share with other spectrum users.
>>
>>
>>     
>
>
>
> Announce your digital  presence via our DX Cluster 
> telnet://cluster.dynalias.org
>
> Our other groups:
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dxlist/
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/contesting
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/wnyar
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Omnibus97 
>
>  
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>   


-- 
AMSAT Director and VP Engineering. Member: ARRL, AMSAT-DL,
TAPR, Packrats, NJQRP, QRP ARCI, QCWA, FRC. ARRL SDR WG Chair
"Taking fun as simply fun and earnestness in earnest shows
how thoroughly thou none of the two discernest." - Piet Hine

Reply via email to