I downloaded the code from the SVN a couple of days ago and I'm wondering what will the Radio core will do, I don't need a detailed explanation just some broad strokes.
At 05:15 PM 2/15/2007, you wrote: >Walt: > >Frank, Eric, and I have specfically answered all of your questions about >the Linux support. It is completely controllable under Linux now >especially for those who have no need for fancy radio GUI's. For those >that need GUI's there ARE GUI's and more will be coming. > >Roger Rehr has painted the road with crayola crayon especially for you: > >http://www.nitehawk.com/w3sz > > >but the Linux code does not have the polished presentation of the >Windows version of code AND IT DOES NOT SUFFER FROM ITS >LIMITATIONS. It is poised to take off now. > >There are several approaches to take such as dttsp-shell (available >from Edson Pereira) or the java GUI done by John Melton or usSDR gui >done by Jonathan Naylor. Frank and I are not interested in doing >this GUI work. We are interested in support anyone who wants to do >the GUI work. > >Bob >N4HY >(coauthor DttSP with AB2KT) > > > > >DuBose Walt Civ AETC CONS/LGCA wrote: > > Peter, > > > > IMHO, the SDR-1000 has some of the best specs. out and is the > most configurable transceiver on the market. I have seen the > insides of the transceiver several times and the construction looks good. > > > > But note that it is only controllable using MS NT (maybe), W2K, > XP but I understand that there is a problem controlling it with > Vista. According to Felx Radio there is third party software to > control the SDR-1000 with Linux but I'll be darned if I can find > anything that gives steps 1, 2, 3, to take, to download, compile > the application or configure the radio. > > > > If a manufacturer claims that there is 3rd party software but > can't tell you where it is, then I think they should not claim that > there is such software and let it go at that. For that reason I am > leery of buying hardware that makes such claims. > > > > I have seen demonstrations of the SDR-1000 and I have used the > TS-1000/2000 series radios and the SDR-1000 is most impressive > against the Yaesu radios. > > > > 73, > > > > Walt/K5YFW > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Peter G. Viscarola > > Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 1:30 PM > > To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com > > Subject: [digitalradio] Can I get a rig with MORE? > > > > > > I work digital modes (PSK, RTTY, MFSK, Olivia, etc) almost exclusively. > > I also have a pretty low noise environment, living out in the > country and with my antenna (a dipole) almost 100' from the nearest > RF noise source. Note that upgrading my antenna system is really > not an option at this point for a whole lot of reasons. > > I presently have a TS-2000 and I like it a lot. I like the > ability to use the IF DSP to narrow the passband from each side to > isolate the signal I want. I've been pretty successful with it, > too. Given my modest setup I'm rapidly closing-in on my first 100 > for DXCC, after being on HF for only about 4 months. > > Could I gain some sensitivity/selectivity/better filtering by > upgrading my rig? What rigs might folks suggest? How about the > SDR-1000? Better? Worse? Something else? > > I'm relatively new to HF, so I'm looking for some elmering > I suppose -- Is my rig doing as well as any? Or, is a significant > step up possible? > > Again... I'm interested strictly in digital mode > performance. And, again, while I'd *like* to put up a tower with a > beam (and I *know* the old adage about 1 dollar spent on antennas > is worth 100 spent in teh shack), that just can't happen (for any > price I can pay) given my location. > > Thanks for your opinions, > > de Peter K1PGV > > > > > > __ > > > > > > > > Announce your digital presence via our DX Cluster > telnet://cluster.dynalias.org > > > > Our other groups: > > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dxlist/ > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/contesting > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/wnyar > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Omnibus97 > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > > > > >-- >AMSAT Director and VP Engineering. Member: ARRL, AMSAT-DL, >TAPR, Packrats, NJQRP, QRP ARCI, QCWA, FRC. ARRL SDR WG Chair >"Taking fun as simply fun and earnestness in earnest shows >how thoroughly thou none of the two discernest." - Piet Hine > > > > >Announce your digital presence via our DX Cluster >telnet://cluster.dynalias.org > >Our other groups: > >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dxlist/ >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/contesting >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/wnyar >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Omnibus97 > > >Yahoo! Groups Links > > > Cecil KD5NWA www.qrpradio.com www.hpsdr.com Cum catapultae proscriptae erunt tum soli proscripti catapultas habebunt. (When catapults are outlawed, only outlaws will have catapults!)
