Poor Bonnie! We are hitting you from both directions:
--some want better weak signal performance at the cost of speed (~HF) --some want more speed at the cost of signal performance (~10M & VHF) ----Original Message Follows---- From: kv9u <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: RSM2400 / MIL-STD-188-110 Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 09:32:30 -0500 If the 110A works this well at 2400 baud, what would happen with slower speeds? From what I understand, it does require a good signal to get through, perhaps comparable to the WinDRM software at maybe +10 S/N dB or maybe a bit below that? 73, Rick, KV9U Per wrote: > Well, MIL-STD-188-110A uses a single phase shifted > tone , I guess that made it even more non-intuitive ? > The difference between packet and this MIL-STD is just > huge. Interleaver to fight fade and QRM, equalization > to benefit from multipath and the list could just go > on and on. 300 baud packet is a joke. > 73 de Per, sm0rwo > > >
