I hate to burst any bubbles here but the HF network ( Packet etc. ) is still 
quite active, and has been seeing some resurgence in recent years. ( New 
stations joining, advancement of the art. )

VHF/UHF Packet networks here and there around the US have also been seeing some 
growth and advancement. ( In addition to unrelated APRS and Telpac activity. ) 
In some areas, this growth has been quite impressive.

Some see these two as unrelated factors, but this not the case. The basic 
network plan is for HF stations to bridge the gap and provide connectivity 
between large-scale VHF/UHF networks. The majority of the traffic then falls to 
the VHF/UHF nets, as most of it is local or regional in nature.

Think about the way VHF/UHF frequencies can be independently utilized with 
little or no interference by thousands of stations around the globe as long as 
they are 100 miles or more apart from each other, compared to the global reach 
of HF signals which makes the HF frequencies much less recycleable or re-usable.

One reality must be addressed here that nobody seems to openly recognize, and 
it is central in importance... - The fact that a national or global amateur 
radio digital network is completely different from the fidonet and internet 
networks it is modeled after, in that the hierarchy of data transfer speed is 
stood upon it's head, with the national and international "backbone" speed and 
throughput being significantly slower than the subnet backbone links and user 
access.

Think about WIFI-speed access, subnet (VHF/UHF) backbone links operating at 
perhaps 1mb, and long-haul links operating at significantly slower speeds than 
that. - This is the reality that mother nature has handed us, to work with. As 
you go from user-access to subnet to long-haul, each step is an order of 
magnitude slower, not faster as fidonet/internet networkers naturally expect. 

Hardly anybody appears to understand this simple reality - and work with it. 
Way too many instead appear to think that they will gain traction by fighting 
mother nature, and so they do not get anywhere and often develop a "can't do" 
attitude or just quit. If it can't be forced to act and look exactly like 
fidonet or the internet, then they throw up their hands and fall into bitter 
negativity.

We can do without the quitters and the "can't do" types, so who does this leave 
to advance the art? 

Not very many, until this simple reality is understood and taken as a starting 
point in all of our considerations.


73 DE Charles Brabham, N5PVL





Reply via email to