Chuck, Would you point me to the claims for fx.25 TNC compatibility? I do not see any specific TNCs mentioned.
I am real curious about this because 2 years or so I looked at doing some experiments with modified protocols using existing TNCs. All of them insisted, even in KISS mode, that the received packet be a valid and correct AX.25 packet. I went so far as to check the TNC-X code to see what changes would be needed to allow it to pass invalid packets but decided not to get into PIC development at that time. I like the streaming capability with multiple packets and the FEC code transmitted in one burst. The time delays waiting for TX stability have a big impact on throughput. Rud Merriam K5RUD ARES AEC Montgomery County, TX http://TheHamNetwork.net -----Original Message----- From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chuck Mayfield - AA5J Sent: Friday, August 08, 2008 3:47 PM To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [digitalradio] AX.25 vs Something New Several modems on that link claim fx.25 compatibility; TNC-X comes to mind, but they all seem to have been developed for VHF/UHF use, so YMMV on HF. Chuck AA5J
