Interleave is a tradeoff... improved error correction vs latency. If you are going to use a digital mode, as an Amateur, you have a responsibility to learn something about how it works. For the general population, software needs to be "idiot proof". This shouldn't be a constraint for software used by Amateurs ;-)
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Andrew O'Brien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Folks, when Simon was first adding Olivia to DM780 he studied Pawel > Jalocha's coding and consulted with him about the correct implementation. > The lag noticed in DM780 is reportedly as the Pawel Jalocha intended. What > I am looking for is people to get on the air with Olivia and see if the > applications that may have less lag , have any noticeable decoding > degradation. Since I know Olivia in MixW and Multipsk work well, I am > wondering if the "proper" implimentation of Olivia in DM780 is worth the > delay and issues this causes during a QSO (those not knowing about the lag > think we are not coming back to them and start a transmission again ) > > Andy > > On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 3:18 AM, Simon Brown (KNS) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > > > The lag is in the software - it's part of the design for the error > > correction. Where error correction is part of the design then *in general* > > with Ham modes you have to wait a while before text is decoding is the > > error > > correction is applied. The lag is not caused by CPU load. > > > > To really understand this it's best to analyse the Olivia design although > > this can be rough for the brain :-) > > > > > > Simon Brown, HB9DRV > > www.ham-radio-deluxe.com > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "captcurt2000" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <captcurt%40flash.net>> > > > > > Sooo. a 500Mhhz machine running at 20% is going to perform the > > > integrations and decoding same delay as a 2 Ghz machine running at 20%?? > > > > > > That seems counter intuitive to me.. > > > > > > I'm sure you're right but I don't understand how that can be. > > > > > > I thought the load information talked about resources not speed of > > > execution. > > > > > > Help me understand.. > > > > > > > > > > -- > Andy K3UK >