We have been talking about using Q15x25 but it turns out to be more talk than doing so we haven't really done much. I think it's quite possible using FBB or MSYS and then using MixW as the TNC. That way you have the error correction of the bbs program and the ability to vary the Q15x25 for a wider or more narrow transmission.
Actually, I think 300 baud does quite well. Of course it is slow, but that is a term relative to your expectations. It is now 2 PM here and I have taken in over 20 messages and have forwarded 35 out today on 40 meters and there are probably five or six more hours of forwarding time before the band closes up between myself and my forwarding partners. That is pretty good, I think. Mark --- On Thu, 2/5/09, "José A. Amador" <ama...@electrica.cujae.edu.cu> wrote: > From: "José A. Amador" <ama...@electrica.cujae.edu.cu> > Subject: Re: [digitalradio] HF packet > To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com > Date: Thursday, February 5, 2009, 12:32 PM > I believe that nowadays 110 baud (or 100 baud) should fare > better. > > Sadly, PAX only passes unproto in Multipsk as modem (but > maybe UI > packets are enough for TCPIP) > > I would have to reinstall JNOS and try with Multipsk. > > 73, > > Jose, CO2JA > > Mark Milburn escribió: > > No...I was thinking of his actually using the program > to connect to a BBS. I should have made that clear. > > 73 Mark > > > > > > > VI Conferencia Internacional de Energía Renovable, Ahorro > de Energía y Educación Energética > 9 - 12 de Junio 2009, Palacio de las Convenciones > ...Por una cultura energética sustentable > www.ciercuba.com > > > ------------------------------------ > > Announce your digital presence via our Interactive Sked > Page at > http://www.obriensweb.com/sked > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > >
