It rarely happens. But both times I noticed it the actually signal was very
strong +20DB. Digital is relatively new to me. This is something that would
never be noticed on phone or CW.

 

From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of DANNY DOUGLAS
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 8:31 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Introduction and question

 

  

Malarkey, unless you are next door to him.  If ALL signals are doing so,
then maybe it is your receiver, but I much doubt it.  You can listen to
14.069 for instance, and hear the two or three kc above that freq, loaded
with signals.  Watch the waterfall and you will see who is overdriving, by
seeing a lot of signals appear and disappear all at the same time.  Others
will set there with just one trace.

 

Danny Douglas
N7DC
ex WN5QMX ET2US WA5UKR ET3USA SV0WPP VS6DD N7DC/YV5 G5CTB
All 2 years or more (except Novice). Short stints at:  DA/PA/SU/HZ/7X/DU
CR9/7Y/KH7/5A/GW/GM/F
Pls QSL direct, buro, or LOTW preferred,
I Do not use, but as a courtesy do upload to eQSL for those who do.  
Moderator
DXandTALK
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DXandTalk
Digital_modes
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digital_modes/?yguid=341090159

----- Original Message ----- 

From: Mark W <mailto:bayboa...@gmail.com>  

To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com 

Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 8:09 PM

Subject: RE: [digitalradio] Re: Introduction and question

 

  

I ran into this. I sent the operator a nice email. He explained that  the
problem was on my end because his sig was overloading my receiver. He seemed
to know more than me so I went with his answer.

From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of DANNY DOUGLAS
Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 8:42 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Introduction and question

  

To bypass all the technical stuff:  just listen to the  PSK bands and watch
for single stations which show up across the waterfall in numerous places.
In most cases, it is because they are sending with too much power.  Ask them
to decrease power, and the extra upper/lower signals just disappear.
Sometimes its difficult to figure outw here they are listening, due to so
many strong signals from the same station.    Like any other mode, one
should always start out with the lowest possible signal, and if they dont
answer, increase it a few watts and try try again.  We are supposed to use
the least power needed for a contact.  Thats part of the Amateur operators
code, isnt it?

Danny Douglas
N7DC
ex WN5QMX ET2US WA5UKR ET3USA SV0WPP VS6DD N7DC/YV5 G5CTB
All 2 years or more (except Novice). Short stints at:  DA/PA/SU/HZ/7X/DU
CR9/7Y/KH7/5A/GW/GM/F
Pls QSL direct, buro, or LOTW preferred,
I Do not use, but as a courtesy do upload to eQSL for those who do.  
Moderator
DXandTALK
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DXandTalk
Digital_modes
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digital_modes/?yguid=341090159
Danny Douglas
N7DC
ex WN5QMX ET2US WA5UKR ET3USA SV0WPP VS6DD N7DC/YV5 G5CTB
All 2 years or more (except Novice). Short stints at:  DA/PA/SU/HZ/7X/DU
CR9/7Y/KH7/5A/GW/GM/F
Pls QSL direct, buro, or LOTW preferred,
I Do not use, but as a courtesy do upload to eQSL for those who do.  
Moderator
DXandTALK
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DXandTalk
Digital_modes
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digital_modes/?yguid=341090159
 

Danny Douglas
N7DC
ex WN5QMX ET2US WA5UKR ET3USA SV0WPP VS6DD N7DC/YV5 G5CTB
All 2 years or more (except Novice). Short stints at:  DA/PA/SU/HZ/7X/DU
CR9/7Y/KH7/5A/GW/GM/F
Pls QSL direct, buro, or LOTW preferred,
I Do not use, but as a courtesy do upload to eQSL for those who do.  
Moderator
DXandTALK
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DXandTalk
Digital_modes
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digital_modes/?yguid=341090159

----- Original Message ----- 

From: Toby Burnett <mailto:ruff...@hebrides.net>  

To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com 

Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 7:51 PM

Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Introduction and question

  



 


See Wes

I knew someone much more technicly minded would come up with a wealth of
information. Lol

Good job Andy

Toby mm0tob 

-------Original Message-------

From: obrienaj <mailto:k3uka...@gmail.com> 

Date: 18/02/2010 00:47:16

To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com

Subject: [digitalradio] Re: Introduction and question

  


Welcome to the group, Wes.

That is an interesting question, I look forward to seeing other answers. 

My answer is rather vague and generalized . I'm going to argue that "reduced
power" is not really the issue, but that reduced power is often associated
with no ALC which most point out is a key in not having a over-driven,
distorted , signal . I say "most" because not every ham agrees with this,
some thing ALC is not that much of a factor.

The prevailing view is that most soundcard modes should not be showing ALC,
PSK31-250, Olivia, AFSK ,RTTY, etc, but some modes like JT65A are less prone
to this issue. FSK RTTY is also not a mode that would be impacted by this
issue.

Consider this from "PSK Fundementals" by Peter G3PLX
(http://aintel.bi.ehu.es/psk31theory.html). Also see
http://www.eham.net/articles/12626 The Good Bad and Ugly on PSK31.

"There is a problem with PSK keying which doesn't show up with FSK, and that
is the effect of key-clicks. We can get away with hard FSK keying at
moderate baudrates without generating too much splatter, but polarity
reversals are equivalent to simultaneous switching-off of one transmitter
and switching-on of another one in antiphase: the result being keyclicks
that are TWICE AS BAD as on-off keying, all other things being equal. So if
we use computer logic to key a BPSK modulator such as an exclusive-or gate,
at 31 baud, the emission would be extremely broad. In fact it would be about
3 times the baudrate wide at 10dB down, 5 times at 14dB down, 7 times at
17dB down, and so on (the squarewave Fourier series in fact)

The solution is to filter the output, or to shape the envelope amplitude of
each bit which amounts to the same thing. In PSK31, a cosine shape is used.
To see what this does to the waveform and the spectrum, consider
transmitting a sequence of continuous polarity-reversals at 31 baud. With
cosine shaping, the envelope ends up looking like full-wave rectified 31Hz
AC. This not only looks like a two-tone test signal, it IS a two-tone test
signal, and the spectrum consists of two pure tones at +/-15Hz from the
centre, and no splatter. Like the two-tone and unlike FSK, however, if we
pass this through a transmitter, we get intermodulation products if it is
not linear, so we DO need to be careful not to overdrive the audio. However,
even the worst linears will give third-order products of 25dB at +/-47Hz (3
times the baudrate wide) and fifth-order products of 35dB at +/-78Hz (5
times the baudrate wide), a considerable improvement over the hard-keying
case. If we infinitely overdrive the linear, we are back to the same levels
as the hard-keyed system. "

Andy K3UK
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com <mailto:digitalradio%40yahoogroups.com>
, "w1...@..." <w1...@...> wrote:
>
> Greetings.
> 
> I am Wes W1LIC in Bangor, ME and just joined this group. I run a Kenwood
TS-480SAT to vertical or dipole antennas. I have an old HP desktop running
XP and use either the FLDIGI or PSKExpress software.
> 
> Although I've been a ham since 1967, I am a newbie to the digital modes.
CW has always been my primary mode of operation. I've had several contacts
via PSK31, but now am interested in trying other modes. This week I had my
first contact via OLIVIA, which seems to be a very interesting mode.
> 
> I've always heard and read that on PSK31 we should greatly reduce our
power and not show any ALC indication when transmitting. Does this same
advice hold true for Olivia and other digital modes as well? I'd appreciate
input from some of you more experienced digital ops. 
> 
> Wes W1LIC
>


                        

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.435 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2684 - Release Date: 02/14/10
19:35:00



No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.435 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2684 - Release Date: 02/14/10
19:35:00

<<image001.gif>>

Reply via email to