Very impressive Jose, again...congratulations. On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 12:25 AM, jose alberto nieto ros < nietoro...@yahoo.es> wrote:
> > > I made the experiment over AWGN and ROS is 2 dBs better than OLIVIA > 32/1000. > > But we are comparing two modes at differents character rate. As you know > ROS is two times faster than OLIVIA 32/1000. > > You should compare ROS 16 with OLIVIA 8/1000. Then the different is about > 5-6 dBs for the same character rate. > > ------------------------------ > *De:* Andy obrien <k3uka...@gmail.com> > *Para:* digitalradio <digitalradio@yahoogroups.com> > *Enviado:* sáb,20 febrero, 2010 00:28 > *Asunto:* [digitalradio] ROS experiments > > > > My "experiments" (many receptions and 2 transmissions) today with > ROS 1 and ROS 16 shows that it is quite an effective mode. > Congratulations Jose. Of particular interest to me were the several > occasions where I decoded a signal that was not visible in the > waterfall or audible to my ears. It will interesting to see if Tony > K2MO gets a chance to put this through the Pathsim tests and compare > it to Olivia. My "guess" is that it will be close to that of Olivia > 1000/32 , perhaps within 2-3 dB. > > I should also point out that I think the software is well designed and > layed out. Over the years we have had many modes come and go. I > suspect that in 2-3 years time, ROS will still be used. > > Andy K3UK > > >
