Congratulation Jose for take your time for develope a new mode.
If is Illegal I think is not, because is experimental and that is part of this
hobby, so for other part the most other new digital mode start in experimental
mode like ROS.
Jose not stop, go a head.
73' Wilfredo "Junior" Aviles / KP4ARN
Amateur Radio is the best way to know People and Travel around the World, FREE
________________________________
From: Andy obrien <k3uka...@gmail.com>
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sat, February 20, 2010 3:21:35 AM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] ROS experiments
Very impressive Jose, again...congratulat ions.
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 12:25 AM, jose alberto nieto ros <nietoro...@yahoo. es>
wrote:
>I made the experiment over AWGN and ROS is 2 dBs better than OLIVIA 32/1000.
>
>But we are comparing two modes at differents character rate. As you know ROS
>is two times faster than OLIVIA 32/1000.
>
>You should compare ROS 16 with OLIVIA 8/1000. Then the different is about 5-6
>dBs for the same character rate.
>
>
>
>
________________________________
De: Andy obrien <k3uka...@gmail. com>
>Para: digitalradio <digitalradio@ yahoogroups. com>
>Enviado: sáb,20 febrero, 2010 00:28
>Asunto: [digitalradio] ROS experiments
>
>
>
>My "experiments" (many receptions and 2 transmissions) today with
>ROS 1 and ROS 16 shows that it is quite an effective mode.
>Congratulations Jose. Of particular interest to me were the several
>occasions where I decoded a signal that was not visible in the
>waterfall or audible to my ears. It will interesting to see if Tony
>K2MO gets a chance to put this through the Pathsim tests and compare
>it to Olivia. My "guess" is that it will be close to that of Olivia
>1000/32 , perhaps within 2-3 dB.
>
>I should also point out that I think the software is well designed and
>layed out. Over the years we have had many modes come and go. I
>suspect that in 2-3 years time, ROS will still be used.
>
>Andy K3UK
>
>
