3586


On 23.02.2010 23:26, Steinar Aanesland wrote:
> Ups wrong freq . try 3580
>
> la5vna Steinar
>
>
>
>
> On 23.02.2010 23:10, Steinar Aanesland wrote:
>   
>> 3680 USB ?
>>
>> la5vna Steinar
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 23.02.2010 22:59, graham787 wrote:
>>   
>>     
>>> The ini file  .. helps if you  have one ! I have re installed , all is 
>>> working , tx key and  tx audio fine ..  what is a  good 80 mtr qrg ?  tnx - 
>>> G .. 
>>>
>>> --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Steinar Aanesland <saa...@...> wrote:
>>>   
>>>     
>>>       
>>>> Strange . I am using a Signalink USB . The on board is 0 and Signalink
>>>> is 1, and it works fine with 1.
>>>>
>>>> la5vna Steinar
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 23.02.2010 22:05, graham787 wrote:
>>>>     
>>>>       
>>>>         
>>>>> Ok Steinar ... I have tried numbers  from 0 to  9 and  nothing happens .. 
>>>>> only sound  from the  motherboard sound card .. selecting  in 3 produces 
>>>>> random print .. so i assume its seeing the  sound card .. but  no tx 
>>>>> audio ..only from the  pc m/bd ..tried the  wspr 3 and 6 setting .. no  
>>>>> tx audio ....
>>>>>
>>>>> G .. 
>>>>>
>>>>> --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Steinar Aanesland <saanes@> wrote:
>>>>>   
>>>>>       
>>>>>         
>>>>>           
>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think 0 is the default sound card . 1 is the next etc.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 73 de LA5VNA Steinar
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 23.02.2010 21:29, graham787 wrote:
>>>>>>     
>>>>>>         
>>>>>>           
>>>>>>             
>>>>>>> ???  running  win-xp-pro with out board usb sound as well  as mother 
>>>>>>> board sound .. how do I select usb card .. can only see number box , 
>>>>>>> sound seems to  come  from main sound card ..how  can you  work out 
>>>>>>> what 'number' a sound card is ?? comport tx is fine 
>>>>>>> Tnx - G .. 
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "obrienaj" <k3ukandy@> wrote:
>>>>>>>   
>>>>>>>       
>>>>>>>           
>>>>>>>             
>>>>>>>               
>>>>>>>> It works , Sholto.  I am able to get PTT working and generate tones.  
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Anyone for G-Tor?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Andy K3UK
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "obrienaj" <k3ukandy@> wrote:
>>>>>>>>     
>>>>>>>>         
>>>>>>>>             
>>>>>>>>               
>>>>>>>>                 
>>>>>>>>> Interesting.  The "about" info reveals Mixw 2003.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I also found this
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "G-TOR (Golay -TOR) is an FSK mode that offers a fast transfer rate 
>>>>>>>>> compared to Pactor. It incorporates a data inter-leaving system that 
>>>>>>>>> assists in minimizing the effects of atmospheric noise and has the 
>>>>>>>>> ability to fix garbled data. G-tor tries to perform all transmissions 
>>>>>>>>> at 300 baud but drops to 200 baud if difficulties are encountered and 
>>>>>>>>> finally to 100 baud. (The protocol that brought back those good 
>>>>>>>>> photos of Saturn and Jupiter from the Voyager space shots was devised 
>>>>>>>>> by M.Golay and now adapted for ham radio use.) G-tor is found in only 
>>>>>>>>> one manufacture's TNC and is rarely used today."
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "sholtofish" <sholto@> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>       
>>>>>>>>>           
>>>>>>>>>               
>>>>>>>>>                 
>>>>>>>>>                   
>>>>>>>>>> Came across this the other day:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> http://db0lj.prgm.org/boxfiles/software/Gtor.zip
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Looks like it's a sound card implementation of G-TOR?? Seems to have 
>>>>>>>>>> a butterfly icon so something to do with MixW??
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Does it work?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>         
>>>>>>>>>>             
>>>>>>>>>>                 
>>>>>>>>>>                   
>>>>>>>>>>                     
>>>>>>>>>       
>>>>>>>>>           
>>>>>>>>>               
>>>>>>>>>                 
>>>>>>>>>                   
>>>>>>>>     
>>>>>>>>         
>>>>>>>>             
>>>>>>>>               
>>>>>>>>                 
>>>>>>>       
>>>>>>>           
>>>>>>>             
>>>>>>>               
>>>>>>     
>>>>>>         
>>>>>>           
>>>>>>             
>>>>>       
>>>>>         
>>>>>           
>>>>     
>>>>       
>>>>         
>>>   
>>>     
>>>       
>>
>>   
>>     
>
>
>   


Reply via email to