as I said before it's just a quick hack to allow direct access to cached data with a ByteBuffer interface- useful to use it in NIO contexts (it was a request made by hiram chirino from the activemq team). Probably it's easy to come up with a better implementation. I was also pointing out that there's already a test for that (NIOTest.java).
Ciao, R Il giorno 18/feb/2012 21:15, "Simone Tripodi" <[email protected]> ha scritto: > +1 to Mau, there is no fault here, Raf!!! > > just to remark that we have been doing a community work here, joining > efforts to make a better product than everybody could make > individually! :) > > What I didn't understand, while applying generics, is why at at a > certain point, Pointer.clazz becomes ByteBuffer.class, when it could > safety be the type of stored object... > > Any hint? > TIA, > -Simo > > http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ > http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ > http://twitter.com/simonetripodi > http://www.99soft.org/ > > > > On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 6:35 PM, Raffaele P. Guidi > <[email protected]> wrote: > > What about NIOTest in org.apache.directmemory.memory? > > > > On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Maurizio Cucchiara > > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > >> Ciao Raffaele, > >> there is no fault, we are still in time to write a small test :) (and > maybe > >> it would be better if you write it, since you are the one with the > deeper > >> overall view). > >> > >> Twitter :http://www.twitter.com/m_cucchiara > >> G+ :https://plus.google.com/107903711540963855921 > >> Linkedin :http://www.linkedin.com/in/mauriziocucchiara > >> > >> Maurizio Cucchiara > >> > >> > >> On 18 February 2012 18:09, Raffaele P. Guidi < > [email protected] > >> >wrote: > >> > >> > Uhm I guess this is my fault... > >> >
