Hi again guys, here is my proposal for switching implementations to <K, V>:
https://github.com/apache/directmemory/pull/2 please review! -Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ http://twitter.com/simonetripodi http://www.99soft.org/ On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 9:36 PM, Raffaele P. Guidi <[email protected]> wrote: > as I said before it's just a quick hack to allow direct access to cached > data with a ByteBuffer interface- useful to use it in NIO contexts (it was > a request made by hiram chirino from the activemq team). Probably it's easy > to come up with a better implementation. I was also pointing out that > there's already a test for that (NIOTest.java). > > Ciao, > R > Il giorno 18/feb/2012 21:15, "Simone Tripodi" <[email protected]> ha > scritto: > >> +1 to Mau, there is no fault here, Raf!!! >> >> just to remark that we have been doing a community work here, joining >> efforts to make a better product than everybody could make >> individually! :) >> >> What I didn't understand, while applying generics, is why at at a >> certain point, Pointer.clazz becomes ByteBuffer.class, when it could >> safety be the type of stored object... >> >> Any hint? >> TIA, >> -Simo >> >> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ >> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ >> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi >> http://www.99soft.org/ >> >> >> >> On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 6:35 PM, Raffaele P. Guidi >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > What about NIOTest in org.apache.directmemory.memory? >> > >> > On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Maurizio Cucchiara >> > <[email protected]>wrote: >> > >> >> Ciao Raffaele, >> >> there is no fault, we are still in time to write a small test :) (and >> maybe >> >> it would be better if you write it, since you are the one with the >> deeper >> >> overall view). >> >> >> >> Twitter :http://www.twitter.com/m_cucchiara >> >> G+ :https://plus.google.com/107903711540963855921 >> >> Linkedin :http://www.linkedin.com/in/mauriziocucchiara >> >> >> >> Maurizio Cucchiara >> >> >> >> >> >> On 18 February 2012 18:09, Raffaele P. Guidi < >> [email protected] >> >> >wrote: >> >> >> >> > Uhm I guess this is my fault... >> >> >>
