Hi, If no other volunteer, I will work on releasing a 0.1 early next week. IHMO this can be considered as a released "technology preview" (even if apis change later).
2012/6/15 Christian Grobmeier <[email protected]>: > On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Jeff MAURY <[email protected]> wrote: >> I think there are a number of items to work before we do a release. >> I'm not very familiar of Apache way of release but I have the feeling that > > releasing is not only putting software "to the public", it is also > "learning how to release" (at least in the incubator). Nobody expects > a perfect release with a 1.0 imho. "Release often, early". > >> if we do a release now, we will break compatibility with next release. >> Why not an Alpha of Beta or continue on a 0.0.x ? > > Nothing speaks against that :-) > 0.0.1 sounds pretty alpha to me, i would skip the term "alpha" and > just make "0.0.1". One can state on the homepage that the API is > matter of change. > > I have only limited time, but I am willing to look at your artifacts > and help pointing you to the right docs with the release. In addition > I think one of the new arrived people should release. As mentioned, it > is learning, and if always the old grumpys release, the new blood does > not gain experience. :-) > > Cheers > Christian > > > > > >> >> Regards >> Jeff >> >> >> On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 12:14 PM, Raffaele P. Guidi < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I am in shortage of spare time since a while and it will be even worse for >>> the next few months. And also I've never managed an Apache release. I think >>> that this is going to take a bit longer than expected. >>> >>> Ciao, >>> R >>> >>> On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 9:17 AM, Tommaso Teofili >>> <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>> > Big +1 for a release, personally I'm busy with (trying to) release Amber >>> at >>> > the moment, if anyone can jump in it'd be perfect otherwise I'll try to >>> do >>> > it once Amber gets a release. >>> > Tommaso >>> > >>> > 2012/6/15 Simone Tripodi <[email protected]> >>> > >>> > > Hi Tim!!! >>> > > >>> > > agreed, a release is "needed", we've been around for a long time - >>> > > time for people to know more from us! :P >>> > > >>> > > I'll contribute on double check the RC, unfortunately I've been too >>> > > much busy in the last months (and still am) so cannot contribute as >>> > > RM. >>> > > >>> > > All the best, >>> > > -Simo >>> > > >>> > > http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ >>> > > http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ >>> > > http://twitter.com/simonetripodi >>> > > http://www.99soft.org/ >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 4:49 AM, Tim Williams <[email protected]> >>> > > wrote: >>> > > > Gents, >>> > > > Can you work out a release soon? You develop and interact according >>> to >>> > > > the apache way and yet you're still in incubation because you've not >>> > > > had a formal release. I'm wondering if one of the old timers around >>> > > > here can be the RM and just get it done so that we can graduate >>> > > > already? Call it 0.1 if needbe:) >>> > > > >>> > > > Thanks, >>> > > > --tim >>> > > >>> > >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Jeff MAURY >> >> >> "Legacy code" often differs from its suggested alternative by actually >> working and scaling. >> - Bjarne Stroustrup >> >> http://www.jeffmaury.com >> http://riadiscuss.jeffmaury.com >> http://www.twitter.com/jeffmaury > > > > -- > http://www.grobmeier.de > https://www.timeandbill.de -- Olivier Lamy Talend: http://coders.talend.com http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy
