I agreed on it, +1 and TIA Olivier! -Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ http://twitter.com/simonetripodi http://www.99soft.org/
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 10:15 PM, Olivier Lamy <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > If no other volunteer, I will work on releasing a 0.1 early next week. > IHMO this can be considered as a released "technology preview" (even > if apis change later). > > 2012/6/15 Christian Grobmeier <[email protected]>: >> On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Jeff MAURY <[email protected]> wrote: >>> I think there are a number of items to work before we do a release. >>> I'm not very familiar of Apache way of release but I have the feeling that >> >> releasing is not only putting software "to the public", it is also >> "learning how to release" (at least in the incubator). Nobody expects >> a perfect release with a 1.0 imho. "Release often, early". >> >>> if we do a release now, we will break compatibility with next release. >>> Why not an Alpha of Beta or continue on a 0.0.x ? >> >> Nothing speaks against that :-) >> 0.0.1 sounds pretty alpha to me, i would skip the term "alpha" and >> just make "0.0.1". One can state on the homepage that the API is >> matter of change. >> >> I have only limited time, but I am willing to look at your artifacts >> and help pointing you to the right docs with the release. In addition >> I think one of the new arrived people should release. As mentioned, it >> is learning, and if always the old grumpys release, the new blood does >> not gain experience. :-) >> >> Cheers >> Christian >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>> Regards >>> Jeff >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 12:14 PM, Raffaele P. Guidi < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> I am in shortage of spare time since a while and it will be even worse for >>>> the next few months. And also I've never managed an Apache release. I think >>>> that this is going to take a bit longer than expected. >>>> >>>> Ciao, >>>> R >>>> >>>> On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 9:17 AM, Tommaso Teofili >>>> <[email protected]>wrote: >>>> >>>> > Big +1 for a release, personally I'm busy with (trying to) release Amber >>>> at >>>> > the moment, if anyone can jump in it'd be perfect otherwise I'll try to >>>> do >>>> > it once Amber gets a release. >>>> > Tommaso >>>> > >>>> > 2012/6/15 Simone Tripodi <[email protected]> >>>> > >>>> > > Hi Tim!!! >>>> > > >>>> > > agreed, a release is "needed", we've been around for a long time - >>>> > > time for people to know more from us! :P >>>> > > >>>> > > I'll contribute on double check the RC, unfortunately I've been too >>>> > > much busy in the last months (and still am) so cannot contribute as >>>> > > RM. >>>> > > >>>> > > All the best, >>>> > > -Simo >>>> > > >>>> > > http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ >>>> > > http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ >>>> > > http://twitter.com/simonetripodi >>>> > > http://www.99soft.org/ >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 4:49 AM, Tim Williams <[email protected]> >>>> > > wrote: >>>> > > > Gents, >>>> > > > Can you work out a release soon? You develop and interact according >>>> to >>>> > > > the apache way and yet you're still in incubation because you've not >>>> > > > had a formal release. I'm wondering if one of the old timers around >>>> > > > here can be the RM and just get it done so that we can graduate >>>> > > > already? Call it 0.1 if needbe:) >>>> > > > >>>> > > > Thanks, >>>> > > > --tim >>>> > > >>>> > >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Jeff MAURY >>> >>> >>> "Legacy code" often differs from its suggested alternative by actually >>> working and scaling. >>> - Bjarne Stroustrup >>> >>> http://www.jeffmaury.com >>> http://riadiscuss.jeffmaury.com >>> http://www.twitter.com/jeffmaury >> >> >> >> -- >> http://www.grobmeier.de >> https://www.timeandbill.de > > > > -- > Olivier Lamy > Talend: http://coders.talend.com > http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy
