2012/6/18 Jeff MAURY <[email protected]>: > On the release notes: > > > We hope you enjoy using Maven --> We hope you enjoy using Apache > DirectMemory Yup that's the typo which wait sync :-) > > I did not had time to review the site yet, sorry. > > Jeff > > > On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 3:56 PM, Olivier Lamy <[email protected]> wrote: > >> So I have started to add a bit of documentation (consider that as a >> "documentation preview" :-)). >> And change the web site too: http://incubator.apache.org/directmemory/ >> >> Release notes will be: >> http://incubator.apache.org/directmemory/releases/release-notes-0.1.html >> (wait a bit sync for a typo fix). >> >> Comments are welcome :-) >> >> 2012/6/15 Olivier Lamy <[email protected]>: >> > Hi, >> > If no other volunteer, I will work on releasing a 0.1 early next week. >> > IHMO this can be considered as a released "technology preview" (even >> > if apis change later). >> > >> > 2012/6/15 Christian Grobmeier <[email protected]>: >> >> On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Jeff MAURY <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> I think there are a number of items to work before we do a release. >> >>> I'm not very familiar of Apache way of release but I have the feeling >> that >> >> >> >> releasing is not only putting software "to the public", it is also >> >> "learning how to release" (at least in the incubator). Nobody expects >> >> a perfect release with a 1.0 imho. "Release often, early". >> >> >> >>> if we do a release now, we will break compatibility with next release. >> >>> Why not an Alpha of Beta or continue on a 0.0.x ? >> >> >> >> Nothing speaks against that :-) >> >> 0.0.1 sounds pretty alpha to me, i would skip the term "alpha" and >> >> just make "0.0.1". One can state on the homepage that the API is >> >> matter of change. >> >> >> >> I have only limited time, but I am willing to look at your artifacts >> >> and help pointing you to the right docs with the release. In addition >> >> I think one of the new arrived people should release. As mentioned, it >> >> is learning, and if always the old grumpys release, the new blood does >> >> not gain experience. :-) >> >> >> >> Cheers >> >> Christian >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >>> Regards >> >>> Jeff >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 12:14 PM, Raffaele P. Guidi < >> >>> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >> >>>> I am in shortage of spare time since a while and it will be even >> worse for >> >>>> the next few months. And also I've never managed an Apache release. I >> think >> >>>> that this is going to take a bit longer than expected. >> >>>> >> >>>> Ciao, >> >>>> R >> >>>> >> >>>> On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 9:17 AM, Tommaso Teofili >> >>>> <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>> > Big +1 for a release, personally I'm busy with (trying to) release >> Amber >> >>>> at >> >>>> > the moment, if anyone can jump in it'd be perfect otherwise I'll >> try to >> >>>> do >> >>>> > it once Amber gets a release. >> >>>> > Tommaso >> >>>> > >> >>>> > 2012/6/15 Simone Tripodi <[email protected]> >> >>>> > >> >>>> > > Hi Tim!!! >> >>>> > > >> >>>> > > agreed, a release is "needed", we've been around for a long time - >> >>>> > > time for people to know more from us! :P >> >>>> > > >> >>>> > > I'll contribute on double check the RC, unfortunately I've been >> too >> >>>> > > much busy in the last months (and still am) so cannot contribute >> as >> >>>> > > RM. >> >>>> > > >> >>>> > > All the best, >> >>>> > > -Simo >> >>>> > > >> >>>> > > http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ >> >>>> > > http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ >> >>>> > > http://twitter.com/simonetripodi >> >>>> > > http://www.99soft.org/ >> >>>> > > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> > > On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 4:49 AM, Tim Williams < >> [email protected]> >> >>>> > > wrote: >> >>>> > > > Gents, >> >>>> > > > Can you work out a release soon? You develop and interact >> according >> >>>> to >> >>>> > > > the apache way and yet you're still in incubation because >> you've not >> >>>> > > > had a formal release. I'm wondering if one of the old timers >> around >> >>>> > > > here can be the RM and just get it done so that we can graduate >> >>>> > > > already? Call it 0.1 if needbe:) >> >>>> > > > >> >>>> > > > Thanks, >> >>>> > > > --tim >> >>>> > > >> >>>> > >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> -- >> >>> Jeff MAURY >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> "Legacy code" often differs from its suggested alternative by actually >> >>> working and scaling. >> >>> - Bjarne Stroustrup >> >>> >> >>> http://www.jeffmaury.com >> >>> http://riadiscuss.jeffmaury.com >> >>> http://www.twitter.com/jeffmaury >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> http://www.grobmeier.de >> >> https://www.timeandbill.de >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Olivier Lamy >> > Talend: http://coders.talend.com >> > http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy >> >> >> >> -- >> Olivier Lamy >> Talend: http://coders.talend.com >> http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy >> > > > > -- > Jeff MAURY > > > "Legacy code" often differs from its suggested alternative by actually > working and scaling. > - Bjarne Stroustrup > > http://www.jeffmaury.com > http://riadiscuss.jeffmaury.com > http://www.twitter.com/jeffmaury
-- Olivier Lamy Talend: http://coders.talend.com http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy
