If that is the case, then the documentation should be amended to match reality.
If that is NOT supposed to be the case, then the people who are doing
that should be ... corrected, to match the same security standards as
the rest of us. :)
D
(who votes for a subnet, preferably one that is listed with ARIN)
At 9:20 PM +0300 7/30/00, Doytchin Spiridonov wrote:
>just to clarify: OpenSRS says "subnet" but actually *they* mean "a list"
>as you can register 1.2.3.4 and 5.6.7.8 with your account at the same time.
>
>regards,
>doytchin
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: Christopher Masto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Sunday, July 30, 2000 7:26 PM
>Subject: My problem [was Re: Fw: a subnet of no more than 64 hosts ?]
>
>
>> On Sat, Jul 29, 2000 at 05:03:08PM -0400, Charles Daminato wrote:
>> > On Sat, 29 Jul 2000, Chuck@WiseElvs wrote:
>> > > Can anyone tell me what Christopher Masto's problem is? Is he a retard
>...
>> > > or does he just insult people who try to answer his questions.
>>
>> Since you asked, I'll tell you what my problem is.
>>
>> My problem is that I am getting fed up with the number of utterly
>> stupid questions being asked by utterly stupid people who have no
>> business being in the Internet business.
>>
>> My problem is that someone who never heard the word "subnet" before
>> intends to start taking people's money to touch the DNS. This does
>> not bode well for an industry that is already painfully short on clue.
>>
>> My problem is that I ANSWERED the question; I did not ASK the
>> question. Yet "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" apparently lacks the reading
>> comprehension skills to have figured that out, and decided to "help"
>> me out by answering a question I didn't ask. Furthermore, he answered
>> it in private mail to me, quoting the original question as well as my
>> answer AND my signature, and to top it off he quoted it in that
>> irritating and incorrect "Jeopardy" style. Then he topped off the
>> topping by giving a WRONG ANSWER. (Hint: a list of IP addresses is
>> not a subnet.) This is not the way to get on my good side.
>>
>> My problem is that I have been watching "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" post to
>> this mailing list for some time, and virtually everything he says is
>> useless, inappropriate, and/or wrong. Posting private mail to a
>> public mailing list is just another example of his ignorance.
>>
>> I apologize for this inappropriate posting. I will not continue this
>> discussion any further, and will simply ignore this guy in the future.
>> I should know better than to respond at all, but occasionally even I
>> make an error in judgment.
>> --
>> Christopher Masto Senior Network Monkey NetMonger
>Communications
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>http://www.netmonger.net
> >
> > Free yourself, free your machine, free the daemon --
>http://www.freebsd.org/
> >
