Actually there is - but not completely related to subnets...
On Sun, 30 Jul 2000, Doytchin Spiridonov wrote:
> this is the case because i asked opensrs a month ago and actually i have
> 3 absolutely different ips which work well. different people have different
> reasons to do that; and i don't believe there is something related to the
> security here?
>
> :)
>
> regards,
> doytchin
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Derek J. Balling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Doytchin Spiridonov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Christopher Masto
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Sunday, July 30, 2000 10:18 PM
> Subject: Re: My problem [was Re: Fw: a subnet of no more than 64 hosts ?]
>
>
> > If that is the case, then the documentation should be amended to match
> reality.
> >
> > If that is NOT supposed to be the case, then the people who are doing
> > that should be ... corrected, to match the same security standards as
> > the rest of us. :)
> >
> > D
> > (who votes for a subnet, preferably one that is listed with ARIN)
> >
> >
> >
> > At 9:20 PM +0300 7/30/00, Doytchin Spiridonov wrote:
> > >just to clarify: OpenSRS says "subnet" but actually *they* mean "a list"
> > >as you can register 1.2.3.4 and 5.6.7.8 with your account at the same
> time.
> > >
> > >regards,
> > >doytchin
> > >
> > >
> > >----- Original Message -----
> > >From: Christopher Masto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >Sent: Sunday, July 30, 2000 7:26 PM
> > >Subject: My problem [was Re: Fw: a subnet of no more than 64 hosts ?]
> > >
> > >
> > >> On Sat, Jul 29, 2000 at 05:03:08PM -0400, Charles Daminato wrote:
> > >> > On Sat, 29 Jul 2000, Chuck@WiseElvs wrote:
> > >> > > Can anyone tell me what Christopher Masto's problem is? Is he a
> retard
> > >...
> > >> > > or does he just insult people who try to answer his questions.
> > >>
> > >> Since you asked, I'll tell you what my problem is.
> > >>
> > >> My problem is that I am getting fed up with the number of utterly
> > >> stupid questions being asked by utterly stupid people who have no
> > >> business being in the Internet business.
> > >>
> > >> My problem is that someone who never heard the word "subnet" before
> > >> intends to start taking people's money to touch the DNS. This does
> > >> not bode well for an industry that is already painfully short on clue.
> > >>
> > >> My problem is that I ANSWERED the question; I did not ASK the
> > >> question. Yet "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" apparently lacks the reading
> > >> comprehension skills to have figured that out, and decided to "help"
> > >> me out by answering a question I didn't ask. Furthermore, he answered
> > >> it in private mail to me, quoting the original question as well as my
> > >> answer AND my signature, and to top it off he quoted it in that
> > >> irritating and incorrect "Jeopardy" style. Then he topped off the
> > >> topping by giving a WRONG ANSWER. (Hint: a list of IP addresses is
> > >> not a subnet.) This is not the way to get on my good side.
> > >>
> > >> My problem is that I have been watching "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" post to
> > >> this mailing list for some time, and virtually everything he says is
> > >> useless, inappropriate, and/or wrong. Posting private mail to a
> > >> public mailing list is just another example of his ignorance.
> > >>
> > >> I apologize for this inappropriate posting. I will not continue this
> > >> discussion any further, and will simply ignore this guy in the future.
> > >> I should know better than to respond at all, but occasionally even I
> > >> make an error in judgment.
> > >> --
> > >> Christopher Masto Senior Network Monkey NetMonger
> > >Communications
> > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >http://www.netmonger.net
> > > >
> > > > Free yourself, free your machine, free the daemon --
> > >http://www.freebsd.org/
> > > >
> >
>
Thanks,
-rwr
Ross Wm. Rader
Director Product Management,
Channel Platform Group
Tucows Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
t. 416.535.0123 x335
f. 416.531.5584
"Embrace the cow, love the cow.
And remember, Winsock means love."
