Another specific point i would like clarified is what is the actual minimum
duration required. The Cira letter referred to a min. duration of 12-24
months (dependent on original dates of registration). Keeping it simply to
a one year min. reg. would keep things nice and simple, imo.
Swerve
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2000 13:38:20 -0700
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: We need .ca answers ASAP!
>
>
> What we need from OpenSRS:
> ==========================
>
> * A notice explaining what plans are in place, forcasted timelines which
> aren't yet official, for implementation of .CA domains (Specifically
> re-registration, if nothing else)
>
> * Recommendation to current RSPs on what they should do in the meantime for
> re-registration of .CA domain names between now, and when OpenSRS is ready
>
> * Please note: It is not acceptable to leave RSPs in suspense and say
> OpenSRS working on it. Is it recommended that we start re-registering
> through www.webnames.ca and www.internic.ca right now?
>
> Now that CIRA has generously sent out thousands of e-mails to all .CA
> holders, and pages like this say all .CA domains will be lost "unless"
> certain procedures are followed:
>
> http://www.webnames.ca/rereg_stepa.shtml
>
> "ALL .CA domain name holders, who registered domain names prior to November
> 2000, registered with CDNnet (the UBC Registry). To be recognized by CIRA,
> you must re-register your domain name with them. Those who do not
> re-register their domain registration will lose their domain."
>
> ----
>
> Our customers are calling with many queries after the CIRA e-mail, and
> we're not sure how to respond, since OpenSRS hasn't really told us in any
> detail what is happening between now and September 18th.
>
>
