Hey R,
I don't think it is 2 years. I guess we'll find out soon, eh.
please keep the list posted.
swerve
-How many hairs does Homer S. have on his head?
> From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2000 20:23:14 -0400 (EDT)
> To: Swerve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: We need .ca answers ASAP!
>
>
> 'I'f 'I' 'R'emember 'C'orrectly...;)
>
> I believe that the 2 years is CIRA mandated. Regardless, we will
> definitely offer multiples of the base (2 years, or 1 year etc.) to giv
> eyou that max flexibility with your clients.
>
> On Sun, 10 Sep 2000, Swerve wrote:
>
>> Holy cryptic, RR. :-) What is :"IIRC"?
>>
>> Is that 2 year choice an opensrs decision? Could it have been or could it
>> be 1 year? Maximum flexibility for customers keeps them happy.
>>
>> digging this rain in toronto.
>>
>> swerve
>>
>>
>>
>>> From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2000 18:17:07 -0400 (EDT)
>>> To: Swerve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> Subject: Re: We need .ca answers ASAP!
>>>
>>>
>>> 2yrs IIRC.
>>>
>>> On Sun, 10 Sep 2000, Swerve wrote:
>>>
>>>> Another specific point i would like clarified is what is the actual minimum
>>>> duration required. The Cira letter referred to a min. duration of 12-24
>>>> months (dependent on original dates of registration). Keeping it simply to
>>>> a one year min. reg. would keep things nice and simple, imo.
>>>>
>>>> Swerve
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>> Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2000 13:38:20 -0700
>>>>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>> Subject: We need .ca answers ASAP!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> What we need from OpenSRS:
>>>>> ==========================
>>>>>
>>>>> * A notice explaining what plans are in place, forcasted timelines which
>>>>> aren't yet official, for implementation of .CA domains (Specifically
>>>>> re-registration, if nothing else)
>>>>>
>>>>> * Recommendation to current RSPs on what they should do in the meantime
>>>>> for
>>>>> re-registration of .CA domain names between now, and when OpenSRS is ready
>>>>>
>>>>> * Please note: It is not acceptable to leave RSPs in suspense and say
>>>>> OpenSRS working on it. Is it recommended that we start re-registering
>>>>> through www.webnames.ca and www.internic.ca right now?
>>>>>
>>>>> Now that CIRA has generously sent out thousands of e-mails to all .CA
>>>>> holders, and pages like this say all .CA domains will be lost "unless"
>>>>> certain procedures are followed:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.webnames.ca/rereg_stepa.shtml
>>>>>
>>>>> "ALL .CA domain name holders, who registered domain names prior to
>>>>> November
>>>>> 2000, registered with CDNnet (the UBC Registry). To be recognized by CIRA,
>>>>> you must re-register your domain name with them. Those who do not
>>>>> re-register their domain registration will lose their domain."
>>>>>
>>>>> ----
>>>>>
>>>>> Our customers are calling with many queries after the CIRA e-mail, and
>>>>> we're not sure how to respond, since OpenSRS hasn't really told us in any
>>>>> detail what is happening between now and September 18th.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> -rwr
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Ross Wm. Rader
>>> Director Product Management,
>>> Channel Platform Group
>>> Tucows Inc.
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> t. 416.535.0123 x335
>>> f. 416.531.5584
>>>
>>> "Embrace the cow, love the cow.
>>> And remember, Winsock means love."
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> -rwr
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Ross Wm. Rader
> Director Product Management,
> Channel Platform Group
> Tucows Inc.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> t. 416.535.0123 x335
> f. 416.531.5584
>
> "Embrace the cow, love the cow.
> And remember, Winsock means love."
>
>
