I would.
It's at a minimum anti-consumer. A stupid policy like this only serves
to piss-off your customers.
Why do you think everyone is leaving Network Solutions in droves?
Doug
Charles Daminato wrote:
>
> I wouldn't call this holding the domain hostage - OpenSRS does not allow
> tranfers past day 0 either (we put the domain on hold). Not to say that
> what NSI is doing is right (it's a rather abrupt change from their older
> policy), but afaik they aren't doing anything illegal or anticompetitive
> (if they were, then we would be as well *ick*)
>
> Charles Daminato
> TUCOWS Product Manager
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> On 15 Jun 2001, Loren Stocker wrote:
>
> > Dear All,
> >
> > We've been had.
> >
> > Suddenly and without warning NSI has changed their policy and now denies
> > domain transfers if a domain is as much as 1-day past due.
> >
> > Is anyone aware of any legal action taken to force NSI to release our domains?
> > --- Please I don't want to hear from those who enjoy telling us we should have
> > acted sooner!
> >
> > The fact is that NSI has WAIVED whatever administrative rights they have by
> > their long standing policy of non-enforcement. They can, as I understand,
> > provide notice and -- subsequently -- enforce the policy. The problem is the
> > abrupt change. We must now either endure or fight. I don't believe NSI has
> > either the ethical or legal right to force us to pay high fees for bad
> > service. I want out.
> >
> > Does anyone else have a problem with this action? I'm going to fight this and
> > the more backlash I can give them the better. Anyone else on board?
> >
> > Best Regards, Loren
> >
> >
