Here is another vote for closed list: (x number of emails per RSP) We are all talking about competitors... my main concern is clients, they also have access to our discussions if they want, and I am not sure I like that idea. No one who is not some how related to an RSP is going to collaborate to the list. Perhaps you could work out how many people on the list have ever wrote to it and we could know how many are pure "listeners".
Jose Luis nombremania.com > From: William X Walsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: William X Walsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 06:04:48 -0800 > To: "Spy OpenSRS Mail" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: "Dave Warren" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re[2]: OpenSRS should not be so Open > > Thursday, Thursday, January 24, 2002, 5:30:46 AM, Spy OpenSRS Mail wrote: > >> When you state it in the open duh. You know a lot more people would build >> nukes if we posted instructions too. > >> My whole point was not to make it easy. Your post frustrates me, that you >> would post such a statement on the list. If I didn't know you to otherwise >> responsible, I'd think, "Don't you even care?" > > Honestly? I think that it is clear that you would not prevent the > real competition from being able to see everything anyway, doing this, > so the only people you exclude are those whom are no real harm at all > in this regard. > > So yeah, I guess you could say that I don't care about trying to setup > some closed off list so that the competition doesn't know what is > going. > > Is there some other reason why a closed list would be desirable? > > I don't see a reason, that's why I am asking. > > -- > Best regards, > William X Walsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > -- > > "There is no better way to exercise the imagination than the study of > the law. No artist ever interpreted nature as freely as a lawyer > interprets the truth." > -- Jean Giradoux > >
