William X Walsh wrote: > > So, if spam is outlawed, you will take a $1000 per year pay cut? > > Didn't think so.
No, I will spend that 15-20 minutes a day doing something that my employer will bill out at $75/hr. > > Spam costs the recipient money. That's the bottom line. > > There are much better arguments, the cost one is the least persuasive > and the most flimsy. The antispam extremists don't do their cause any > service by using it as their rallying point. What do you propose as a better argument? The "it's annoying" argument? -kb -- Kris Benson ABC Communications +1 (250)612-5270 x204 +1 (888)235-1174 x204
