Yeah...I can do that. But its still 3rd level... you know... *@first.last.name instead of
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Its awkward at the 3rd level. Regardless, I actually had one client threaten to go to another registrar if I can't offer him such an obvious service. My problem is that I agree with him. We should offer this service, although there is not place he can go... :( -bryanw -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mark Petersen Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 12:02 AM To: Bryan Waters; Charles Oldfield; Discuss-List@Opensrs. Net Subject: Re: .NAME e-mail bundle upgrades Does your email server support a default user? Like "catchrest"? Couldn't you just set up that user, and it forward everything to wherever? ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bryan Waters" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Charles Oldfield" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Discuss-List@Opensrs. Net" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 10:57 PM Subject: RE: .NAME e-mail bundle upgrades > Yeah...i offered that. Not good enough... ;( > > -----Original Message----- > From: Charles Oldfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 10:05 PM > To: Bryan Waters; Discuss-List@Opensrs. Net > Subject: Re: .NAME e-mail bundle upgrades > > > Might be longer than they want, but why don't they just set up an mx record > for the .name domain. I could get, for instance, > [EMAIL PROTECTED], or whatever I set up. Might be somewhat > redundant, but it works. > > Charles Oldfield > > > At 08:56 PM 6/11/2002 -0700, Bryan Waters wrote: > >I have repeated requests to upgrade the .NAME packages for those > individuals > >who did not buy the e-mail bundle originally. Surely this is something > that > >will be available sometime???! We can't just say you can never have your > >.NAME forwarded if you didn't buy it up front...?!? > > > >-bryanw > >
