This will definitely be a service that customers expect us to be able to offer. I know that the .name registry is a bit out of sorts at the moment, but please keep the pressure on them to offer this upgrade as a normal part of their product. Customers will not understand - and they would be correct in their thinking - when the registry processes for this make it impossible or financially unattractive.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is the format that .name domain holders will expect. It's what's being hyped as the "permanent" email address, and [EMAIL PROTECTED] is not the same... -t > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bryan Waters > Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 9:46 AM > To: Mark Petersen; Charles Oldfield; Discuss-List@Opensrs. Net > Subject: RE: .NAME e-mail bundle upgrades > > > Yeah...I can do that. But its still 3rd level... > > you know... *@first.last.name instead of > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Its awkward at the 3rd level. Regardless, I actually had one > client threaten to go to another registrar if I can't offer > him such an obvious service. My problem is that I agree with > him. We should offer this service, although there is not > place he can go... :( > > -bryanw > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mark Petersen > Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 12:02 AM > To: Bryan Waters; Charles Oldfield; Discuss-List@Opensrs. Net > Subject: Re: .NAME e-mail bundle upgrades > > > Does your email server support a default user? Like > "catchrest"? Couldn't you just set up that user, and it > forward everything to wherever? > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Bryan Waters" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Charles Oldfield" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; > "Discuss-List@Opensrs. Net" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 10:57 PM > Subject: RE: .NAME e-mail bundle upgrades > > > > Yeah...i offered that. Not good enough... ;( > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Charles Oldfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 10:05 PM > > To: Bryan Waters; Discuss-List@Opensrs. Net > > Subject: Re: .NAME e-mail bundle upgrades > > > > > > Might be longer than they want, but why don't they just set up an mx > record > > for the .name domain. I could get, for instance, > > [EMAIL PROTECTED], or whatever I set up. Might > be somewhat > > redundant, but it works. > > > > Charles Oldfield > > > > > > At 08:56 PM 6/11/2002 -0700, Bryan Waters wrote: > > >I have repeated requests to upgrade the .NAME packages for those > > individuals > > >who did not buy the e-mail bundle originally. Surely this is > > >something > > that > > >will be available sometime???! We can't just say you can > never have > > >your .NAME forwarded if you didn't buy it up front...?!? > > > > > >-bryanw > > > > > > > >
