Hi Jim. You will pick as part of your brand setup what your setting is, your customer will never have to choose. (all accounts under the brand will have that setting applied) It will be your choice which model you offer.
If you choose the HTML option, the export fee is not relevant. Their site will always be in a format that can be downloaded from you on your servers. Kim Phelan Product Manager Tucows, Inc. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jim McAtee Sent: Friday, June 18, 2004 5:48 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: OpenSRS Live Reseller Update - [Website Builder]- 06/10/04 Will pure HTML be the default? That would certainly be my recommendation. That way, caveats and warnings against the pitfalls of using the JavaScript source obfuscation need never be published by the reseller. You could assume that anyone purposely switching from publishing their site in simple HTML to the JavaScript-ized version is doing so for a reason. Actually, to avoid support headaches it would be even better if the reseller could disable the ability to JavaScript-ize altogether. What's going to be happening with the 'Export Fee'? Users may still wish to download the complete site when departing, or else periodically for their own backup purposes. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kim Phelan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, June 18, 2004 3:19 PM Subject: RE: OpenSRS Live Reseller Update - [Website Builder]- 06/10/04 > Kai, > this issue has been resolved and an HTML option has been > created, and will be available July 6th. > > You will find this further down the discuss list. > > Further info on dates etc, can be found on the RRC > at http://rrc.tucows.com/releasenotes/websitebuilder/ > > Thanks > > Kim > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Kai Schaetzl > Sent: Friday, June 18, 2004 5:06 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: OpenSRS Live Reseller Update - [Website Builder]- 06/10/04 > > > Kim Phelan wrote on Thu, 10 Jun 2004 17:23:11 -0400: > > > as > > will most of their visitors. > > > > I'm fine with requiring scripting enabled for the editor and anything else > the client does. But requiring that visitors have scripting enabled is > AWFUL. Ok, if you provide layout features which require script there's no > other way. But if the user builds a layout which doesn't need any > scripting? This is nothing I can sell without telling customers tenfold > and in bold letters the caveats of using this system. I was about to have > a look at it during the next weeks, but now that I know that I'm not sure > if it's worth my time. > I don't believe that one would loose many customers over time when the > system would not "protect" itself. I strongly suggest rethinking this > requirement. > > > Kai > > -- > > Kai Schdtzl, Berlin, Germany > Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com > IE-Center: http://ie5.de & http://msie.winware.org
