Hi,
Am 13.10.2010 18:32, schrieb Peter Tholstrup:
As I'm brand new here (merit-score = zero :), I apologize if the following is either misunderstood or not relevant: The way I see it, formally approved documents are static, and once approved should not be edited by anybody - Steering Committee members or not.
Correct.
Therefore I do not think it is appropriate from a governance perspective to have direct and potentially ambiguous 'copies' of formal documents as wiki pages. Could it be worth considering that significant formal documents like the manifesto would have their own wiki pages with a backround/brief description, maybe even extracts, and then a link to the 'real' document in a non-editable format (pdf or whatever will make it most easily accessible)?
This is what actually happened - we have the manifesto as pdf at our website. In fact formal approved documents should go to the tdf website, not to the wiki.
For today it was just easier for me to access the wiki.
Another wiki page could then be a Steering Committee 'log' page, which gives a quick overview of the continuous work of the committee with links to more in-depth wiki pages as well as formal documents...
Absolutely agree (but formal documents should not stay forever at the wiki and rather be moved to the website).
This was just the first start. We need to have minutes, some backround info on SC ... at the wiki.
regards, André -- To unsubscribe, e-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted. List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/