On Sat, 06 Nov 2010 12:04:36 -0600, Ian <ian.ly...@theingots.org> wrote:
On Sat, 2010-11-06 at 18:55 +0100, Gianluca Turconi wrote:
Il 06/11/2010 17.50, Robert Holtzman ha scritto:
> That's fine as long as those hands remain benevolent. Not always a
good
> assumption.
If you think so, no foundation is needed at all.
--
Gianluca Turconi
To me, the main reason to have a Foundation is to have a central place
to gather and administer resources. Democratic or benevolent
dictatorship? That is an entirely different debate.
The goal of doing this is to generate income for the foundation, so having
an audit on the administration doesn't really acomplish anything. Just
show distrust to generate income. At the same time, even if such distrust
exist, it doesnt really matter as long as it shows (with actions more than
number) that is reaching it's goal.
In other words, you dont care if a government has corruption inside it's
administration as long as you see performing well. Doing constant audits
doesn't really matter if there is no 'jobs' or whatever is needed in the
country.
You can apply the same thing to any other service public or private.
Liability is a factor of life.
--
Alexandro Colorado
OOoES A.C - http://oooes.org
GPG: 68D072E6
--
Unsubscribe instructions: Email to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines: http://netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html
Archive: http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived ***
