On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 11:29 AM, Andy Brown <a...@the-martin-byrd.net> wrote: > On Fri Dec 31 2010 11:17:28 GMT-0800 (PST) Carl Symons wrote: >> >> On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 11:01 AM, Andy Brown <a...@the-martin-byrd.net> >> wrote: >>> >>> On Fri Dec 31 2010 10:53:16 GMT-0800 (PST) Paul Gress wrote: >>>> >>>> On 12/31/10 07:50 AM, Gordon Burgess-Parker wrote: >>>>> >>>>> The answer to ALL this nonsense is surely this. >>>>> If you receive an OOXML document, politely reply to the sender and >>>>> request that they send it in another format, explaining why. >>>>> And BTW, the latest Open Office ALSO supports writing to OOXML >>>>> format... >>>>> >>>> As I've stated previously, what version? I have installed OOo dev 3.4 >>>> (m95) and 3.3 OOo rc8 (m18) and I can't save as a "docx". >>>> >>>> >>>> Paul >>>> >>> They are using the Go-oo version so that explains it. Plain old OOo does >>> not have the docx save as docx ability. If one reads the links in the >>> original post they will find out why. Hint: Novell is in bed with M$. >>> >>> >> >> Does this mean that Go-oo is driven by Novell? The contact on >> go-oo.org/about has a novell.com email address. >> > > Yep. Go back to the first message in this thread and follow the links. > Very eye opening. > > Andy >
You're right, some interesting reading there and on the links. The Go-oo homepage also says "Going forward, the Go-oo project will be discontinued in favor of LibreOffice." Does that mean that LibreOffice is driven by Novell too? -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
