But why only for Thunderbird? Why not make an open container (or just modularize the existing one with a well defined interface) to will allow any application to use the resources (e.g. dictionaries) and have full integration with all LO resources?
On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 20:36, Lee Hyde <anub...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 01/01/11 19:20, Craig A. Eddy wrote: > > So, what am I saying? You don't NEED to add something useless like > > Outlook or Evolution to LO. You just have to allow Thunderbird to > > connect to it, and people can make their own choice as to whether they > > want all the other bells and whistles. Therefore, no increase in size > > due to bundling but the advantage that those that WANT the extras can > > have them without difficulty > > I agree, an integration add-on for Thunderbird (and any other e-mail > clients or contact managers with an add-on architecture) would be a far > better use of resources. Simply making contacts available to LibreOffice > would do wonders for mail-merge luck functionality (for the life of me I > can't think of any other functionalities one would require of an outlook > clone). > > -- > "The division of mankind threatens it with destruction. Only universal > cooperation under conditions of intellectual freedom and the lofty moral > ideals of socialism and labor, accompanied by the elimination of > dogmatism and pressure of the concealed interests of ruling classes, > will preserve civilization." > > -- Andrei Sakharov, The New York Times (July 22nd, 1968) > > > -- > Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to > discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org<discuss%2bh...@documentfoundation.org> > Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ > *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity *** > > -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
