On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 2:07 PM, Jason Corfman <jkco...@gmail.com> wrote: > I've been reading through this discussion (as much as possible), and there > is one thing that that I don't understand. > > Why do we have so many people complaining about LO writing in the .docx > format but nobody (that I've seen) is complaining about the .doc format? > Both are Microsoft formats, but the docx format is a lot closer to being an > open standard. (Notice, I said it was closer, not that it was, an open > standard). At least the docx format has some released specifications (as > inaccurate as they may be), the last I checked, .doc doesn't even have that.
The docx format is a scam in my view (read some of the links in the original message of this thread for background on that opinion). Until MS complies fully with the open standards, the only value of docx is to subvert truly open software. This is a pattern in MS' behavior over time. I don't like that in the US, computer science in high school consists of Word and Excel training. But that's the way it is. That said, I trust in the open community environment of LibreOffice. The comments and clarifications from Italo Vignoli, Olivier Hallot, Charles-H. Schulz (apologies if I missed anyone) from The Document Foundation demonstrate a willingness to listen and guide LibO development in a reasoned fashion. Even though I don't appreciate the steps Microsoft took to get their file format approved by the standards body, the fact is that it is approved (I realize that there are nuances to that.) The Document Foundation faces a difficult task bringing an open office suite into being. I was overjoyed to hear about LibreOffice. It is a bold, risky adventure. It faces major challenges. Consequently, I defer to TDF's sensibility about this situation; I'll support whatever they decide on this issue. The final chapters on docx/OOXML have not been written. Italo's statement of a philosophy of FOR is exactly right IMHO. The fact that this email thread exists, that it allows for all manner and strength of opinion, is testimony to the strength of open source software. It also illustrates a guiding principle of TDF. To The Document Foundation, thank you. Thank you for starting this project, for listening, for creating LibO in a meritocracy. Carl Symons -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
