On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 2:50 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton <dennis.hamil...@acm.org> wrote: > I didn't say I didn't know how to do it. I didn't say I wanted to build it. > This is about honoring the spirit of the free software promise. It is not > even about building the code. People may want to do any number of things > with the source code (inspect for bugs, for example). >
To honour the "spirit" of the free software promise, it should be more than adequate to grab the git repositories. Ask me if you want more details for this. To honour the "letter" of the free software promise, then you do need those 3.3.2 tarballs. A quick look at the TDF download website shows that it currently covers the latest versions (due to space?), 3.3.3 for the 3.3 line, and 3.4.0 for the 3.4 line. Digging a bit deeper shows this http://ftp.heanet.ie/mirrors/tdf/libreoffice/box/3.3.2/LibO_3.3.2-2_DVD_allplatforms_de.iso 2.8GB DVD ISO which I believe has the source code. People who actually want to do things with the source code would need to use the git repositories, as it shows the changes between different versions. You can also view online your 3.3.2 branch at http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice Simos > I *did* say I don't see where the distro tells me how to find it and I don't > see where the download page lets me find it "in the same way" (and now I > can't even find the version that I am running). 20-21 tar.bz's are also > rather intimidating, but way better than nothing. > > So, where is the link on the web site that would let me find the version I am > running and the source code for it? (The same question for dependency > derivatives is a bonus question.) > > - Dennis > > -----Original Message----- > From: Simos Xenitellis [mailto:simos.li...@googlemail.com] > Sent: Friday, June 17, 2011 16:31 > To: discuss@documentfoundation.org > Subject: Availability of source code (Was: Re: OFF TOPIC about GPL > enforcement (Was: Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: [Libreoffice] Proposal to join Apache > OpenOffice)) > > On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 1:30 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton > <dennis.hamil...@acm.org> wrote: > [ ... ] >> I have a copy of LibreOffice 3.3.2 installed on my computer. I am looking >> for any place that I am offered access to the specific (or, indeed, any) >> source code for the LibreOffice 3.3.2 distribution that I have installed >> (en-win-x86). >> > > Admittedly, I never checked the UI text as to where you can get the > source code. > > To build LibreOffice, I would simply follow the instructions at > http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/How_to_build > which cover different operating systems. > > [ ... ] > > Your question is actually about whether we can make the Help→License > information more informative > so that users who would like to build LibreOffice, will get directed > to the How_to_build page. > > [ ... ] > >> If I follow the "Download the source code to build your own installer" (why >> does that have to be the reason?), I see a set of logs that tell me nothing. >> Under 3.4.1.1, 3.4.0.2, and 3.3.3.1 I see lists of 20-21 tar.bz2's. >> >> Well, maybe that qualifies. Maybe not. But what about for my 3.3.2? >> > > Indeed, the 3.3.2 version is not showing, because there are newer > versions (3.4.1, 3.4.0 and 3.3.3) and the 3.3.2 does not fit to be in > that page. > You can get 3.3.2 files at > http://download.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/ > http://download.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/src/ > > As I said earlier, if you really want to compile, you would go for the > 'git repositories' and the instructions at > http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/How_to_build > >> AND ABOUT THOSE DEPENDENCIES >> >> If any of the listed dependencies also have derivatives used, is there some >> place where, ahem, those modified sources are available in some suitable way? >> > > See the dependencies at > http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/How_to_build#Dependencies > > Simos > > -- > Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org > Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette > List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ > All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted > > > -- > Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org > Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette > List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ > All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted > -- A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion Q. Why is top posting bad? -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
