Please stay on topic, and discuss AskLibO blitzes issues! >-----Original Message----- >From: Pedro [mailto:[email protected]] >Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2012 4:12 PM >To: [email protected] >Subject: [tdf-discuss] Re: AskLibO blitzes > >Hi Marc > > >Marc Paré wrote >> >>>> OpenID is a foundation and yes, it does provide traffic statistics >>>> to its members. In our case TDF/LibreOffice could become a member >>>> that dispenses OpenID login/passwords >>> >>> The fact that it is a "Foundation" does not make it trustworthy per >>> se ;) Even so since the traffic generated by a TDF/LO OpenID is >>> collected by the foundation's servers, the data is >available to all, >>> right? >> >> I think this is the way it works. Although, the foundation TDF does >> represent all of us, collectively. Who then can you really trust any >> better than yourself? >> > >I was referring to the OpenID Foundation, not to TDF. And I >was referring to the traffic data being available to all the >OpenID members not to all TDF members. In any case TDF does >not represent me since i'm not a member and i have not elected >it's members :) I'm just a free user ;) > > >Marc Paré wrote >> >>> I guess that if I stopped trusting Mozilla I would have to switch >>> browser. >>> ALL of my online information is typed on a browser >programmed by Mozilla. >>> Compared to that, only a small portion of the information is in the >>> hands of Google (and that is why I deliberately don't use Chrome) >> >> Hmmm, Mozilla makes the bulk of its operating funds from the "Google >> Search" window. So when you search from this window, I imagine that >> Google is also (with the help of the Mozilla Group) listening in on >> the search patterns of FF users. > >Yes, i'm aware that any search is logged, especially if i'm >logged in to my Gmail account on any tab (which i avoid doing). >But i was referring to the browser itself. I have to believe >that the browser is not logging and sending what i type in my >work's webmail or on my website's PMs or any other information >typed on the main browser window. If i begin to doubt that, >then i will enter into severe paranoia :) > > >Marc Paré wrote >> >> Regardless of the method, there will always be a primary >organism that >> will collect the login/password data. In our case, the data >we collect >> would go towards making the site more accessible and more of a >> fruitful event for our users. I don't believe at this point either >> system is better or worse. >> > >Of course having a single OpenID for all TDF sites would be a >great improvement. But it would still be yet another set of >login/password to memorize... And as i said having TDF as the >primary organism gives me more confidence than any of the >existing OpenID members. But i was referring to the concern of >using a TDF OpenID on other sites and having that traffic >information shared with to all OpenID corporate members. > >Cheers, >Pedro > >-- >View this message in context: >http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/AskLibO-blitzes-tp3984755p 3985318.html >Sent from the Discuss mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >-- >Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected] >Problems? >http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ >Posting guidelines + more: >http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette >List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ >All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and >cannot be deleted >
-- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected] Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
