Not that I know of, though that would be something good to compile. Shall we start here?
http://chronicle.com/blogs/wiredcampus/students-push-for-open-education-meets-faculty-ambivalence/21261 -Adi On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 12:22 PM, Rich Jones <[email protected]> wrote: > The most important thing here are the citations - does anybody have a handy > collections of SFC references in the media? > > R > > > On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 9:55 AM, Rob Myers <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 11/30/2010 01:30 PM, Jon Lebkowsky wrote: >> >>> I glanced at the article; the facts are there, the tone could be more >>> objective. >>> >> >> The tone gets less NPOV describing the more recent history and current >> organization of chapters. >> >> It might be worth deleting some of this and keeping the article tightly >> focussed on the history of the organization. People can find out about the >> structure on the website. >> >> >> SCDC seems pretty clearly defined to me: Swarthmore Coalition for the >>> Digital Commons. Might be good to put SCDC in parens after that >>> reference, for better clarity. >>> >> >> I added a definition. >> >> The wonder of Wikipedia is that even wikilawyering deletionist >> speed-readers can be of use in improving articles. ;-) >> >> - Rob. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Discuss mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss >> FAQ: http://wiki.freeculture.org/Fc-discuss >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss > FAQ: http://wiki.freeculture.org/Fc-discuss > >
_______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss FAQ: http://wiki.freeculture.org/Fc-discuss
