http://freeculture.org/blog/category/news/press/ is supposed to be the
category where we blogged every mention of SFC in the media. I think
recently we've been less religious about blogging every mention of SFC in
the media, and it's also possible that people have forgotten about that
category :)

~Nelson~

On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 12:22 PM, Rich Jones <[email protected]> wrote:

> The most important thing here are the citations - does anybody have a handy
> collections of SFC references in the media?
>
> R
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 9:55 AM, Rob Myers <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On 11/30/2010 01:30 PM, Jon Lebkowsky wrote:
>>
>>> I glanced at the article; the facts are there, the tone could be more
>>> objective.
>>>
>>
>> The tone gets less NPOV describing the more recent history and current
>> organization of chapters.
>>
>> It might be worth deleting some of this and keeping the article tightly
>> focussed on the history of the organization. People can find out about the
>> structure on the website.
>>
>>
>>  SCDC seems pretty clearly defined to me: Swarthmore Coalition for the
>>> Digital Commons.  Might be good to put SCDC in parens after that
>>> reference, for better clarity.
>>>
>>
>> I added a definition.
>>
>> The wonder of Wikipedia is that even wikilawyering deletionist
>> speed-readers can be of use in improving articles. ;-)
>>
>> - Rob.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Discuss mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>> FAQ: http://wiki.freeculture.org/Fc-discuss
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> FAQ: http://wiki.freeculture.org/Fc-discuss
>
>
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
FAQ: http://wiki.freeculture.org/Fc-discuss

Reply via email to