On 28/02/07, Alexandre Plennevaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> as for feature, proportional dimensions is a must IMO. There is no > >> sense fixing width and height of thickbox in today's multitude of screen > sizes... > > >What exactly do you mean by that. Currently if an image is too large for > the viewport it gets resized. Is it that? I took that >from the current > Thickbox without any changes. > > > I mean with TB, you specify its width and height by giving pixel values > (width=600&height=400 for example). > This is wrong: if the users has a 20000 pixel wide monitor (or a very small > screen), TB should use whatever screen assets the user has. That is why > width=90% is better.
Perhaps there should be min-width/height (and max while you are at it) if you are going to use percentages. Also how would you indicate it (perhaps width=90&height=90&unit=percent)? Is it to be % of screen or window (I assume window)? I can't imagine someone having a monitor that big. If they did, they probably would not have the browser maximised (as most sites would look bad at very high resolution). Those with small screens probably have a portable device, which thickbox won't work in anyway. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Klaus Hartl > Sent: mercredi 28 février 2007 14:49 > To: jQuery Discussion. > Subject: Re: [jQuery] ANNOUNCE: Thickbox Reloaded alpha > > Alexandre Plennevaux schrieb: > > If filesize is to be TB biggest advantage, personally in fact i rarely > > need to be able to launch a TB with iframe, ajax and images on the > > same page, or even Application. > > > > I guess i'm not the only one to choose before hand at design time how > > my app will use TB (ajax/iframe) to display interfaces. I would > > therefore love to have 3 different thickbox plugins, so 3 different > > files. If i need to mix, just adding the script source link to the > > related TB version would enable me to. > > > > <script src="plugin.thickbox.images.js" > > type="text/javascript"></script> <script src="plugin.thickbox.ajax.js" > > type="text/javascript"></script> <script > > src="plugin.thickbox.iframe.js" type="text/javascript"></script> > > > > this would also enable to build more functionalities for specific uses > > (gallery, zoom, prev/next only apply to images). > > I just wrote in reply to Sam, that I'm thinking about making TR modular > exactly like that. The basis is already there. On the other hand, for the > Ajax example it just saves us 5 lines of code... > > > > as for feature, proportional dimensions is a must IMO. There is no > > sense fixing width and height of thickbox in today's multitude of screen > sizes... > > What exactly do you mean by that. Currently if an image is too large for the > viewport it gets resized. Is it that? I took that from the current Thickbox > without any changes. > > > > thank you! > > Thank you for feedback. And all the others! I hope we can build a Thickbox > everybody (ok, hopefully most of us) is satisfied with! > > And while I'm at it, thanks to cody for letting us do this! > > > -- klaus > > > > -- klaus > > _______________________________________________ > jQuery mailing list > discuss@jquery.com > http://jquery.com/discuss/ > > -- > Ce message Envoi est certifié sans virus connu. > Analyse effectuée par AVG. > Version: 7.5.447 / Base de données virus: 268.18.4/705 - Date: 27/02/2007 > 15:24 > > > > _______________________________________________ > jQuery mailing list > discuss@jquery.com > http://jquery.com/discuss/ > _______________________________________________ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
