have you ever made a dtd that the validator likes? I gave up on that a
while back!
good luck!
On 3/3/07, Daemach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Actually I think I may just modify the validator code to read out of a custom
> expando. It would be nice to be able to pass the attribute name to the
> validator engine directly though...
>
> Jorn? <==(sorry - I don't know how to do the fancy "o" ;)
>
>
>
> Ⓙⓐⓚⓔ wrote:
> >
> > after reading this thread I feel comfortable using my own
> > 'expando'/'extendo' attributes again, and using classes too!
> >
> > but classes are the only way to pass the validators! If you are
> > horribly concerned with possible interaction with css classes, you
> > could remove the javascript class with jquery, add an expando, and
> > deal with it then! the validators don't care what you do with the dom,
> > just the html!
> >
> >
> > On 3/3/07, Daemach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> I'm assuming you mean that you're comfortable adding an extra attribute
> >> to an
> >> element - is that correct?
> >>
> >>
> >> Glen Lipka wrote:
> >> >
> >> > I'm quoting Mike Alsup from the jQuery 1.1.2 thread, which I thought
> >> did a
> >> > good job relating to this question:
> >> > Based on this info, I feel totally safe using it. I can't even think
> >> of a
> >> > reason to use objects in this way, but I am not that complex. :)
> >> >
> >> > *That's correct. It's safe to store primitives in an expando because
> >> > the aren't reference counted for garbage collection. But objects are
> >> > trouble. An IE memory leak pattern is as simple as this:
> >> >
> >> > var o = document.getElementById('A');
> >> > document.getElementById('A').myprop = o;
> >> >
> >> > Jack Slocum has a good blog entry on avoiding memory leaks:
> >> >
> >> > **
> >> >
> >> http://www.jackslocum.com/blog/2006/10/02/3-easy-steps-to-avoid-javascript-memory-leaks/
> >> >
> >> *<http://www.jackslocum.com/blog/2006/10/02/3-easy-steps-to-avoid-javascript-memory-leaks/>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > *Mike*
> >> >
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > jQuery mailing list
> >> > [email protected]
> >> > http://jquery.com/discuss/
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >> --
> >> View this message in context:
> >> http://www.nabble.com/Of-extendos%2C-metadata-and-valid-XHMTL---Is-it-ok-to-add-attributes-to-elements--tf3337204.html#a9292741
> >> Sent from the JQuery mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> jQuery mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> http://jquery.com/discuss/
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Ⓙⓐⓚⓔ - יעקב ʝǡǩȩ ᎫᎪᏦᎬ
> > _______________________________________________
> > jQuery mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://jquery.com/discuss/
> >
> >
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Of-extendos%2C-metadata-and-valid-XHMTL---Is-it-ok-to-add-attributes-to-elements--tf3337204.html#a9292864
> Sent from the JQuery mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> jQuery mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://jquery.com/discuss/
>
--
Ⓙⓐⓚⓔ - יעקב ʝǡǩȩ ᎫᎪᏦᎬ
_______________________________________________
jQuery mailing list
[email protected]
http://jquery.com/discuss/
