Easy there tiger. Brice is one of the cool ones on here and I think he's just voicing his opinion in general. I didn't read it as anything personal against ya. :o)
Could everybody please just take a deep breath and re-read anything they're about to post? Lets stay cool with each other. :o) Rey.... Daemach wrote: > Thanks for the beatdown Brice! I'm glad you're the only jerk I've seen on > this list! > > And don't be an elitist prick - some people reviewing this framework are new > to jQuery and some even to javascript programming itself. If you can't say > something nice, go work at Microsoft. > > > Brice Burgess wrote: >> Daemach wrote: >>> I would like to be able to dump the contents of the current selector to >>> the >>> console using $"#myselector").debug() without loading a plugin. >>> Something >>> as simple as the following would work, though if you devs have some ideas >>> on >>> how to make it more useful I'm sure it would be welcomed, especially by >>> new >>> users: >>> >>> jQuery.fn.debug = function() { >>> console.log(this); >>> return this; >>> } >>> >>> Long chains that include callbacks with anonymous functions make it >>> difficult to use console.log($()). Can this be added to the jQ codebase >>> so >>> it's always available? >>> >> This is a ridiculous, not well thought out, and highly >> individual/personalized request. Of course this should be a plugin! All >> debuggers are "plugins" AFAIK -- or, at least compile time flags. Please >> keep the core lean, mean, and clean, and think thrice before bloating. >> >> ~ Brice >> >> ~ Brice >> >> _______________________________________________ >> jQuery mailing list >> discuss@jquery.com >> http://jquery.com/discuss/ >> >> > -- BrightLight Development, LLC. 954-775-1111 (o) 954-600-2726 (c) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.iambright.com _______________________________________________ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/