I don't think substituting Sun for Oracle is a worthy enough result to justify
the risks associated with the change (which are purely non-technical). So I'd
oppose this effort. Its only worth doing if we can eliminate the message
altogether, but as I indicated, that requires a rewrite.
- Garrett
On Feb 20, 2012, at 3:55 PM, Alasdair Lumsden wrote:
> On 20 Feb 2012, at 23:46, Garrett D'Amore wrote:
>> Haha! Actually I think both of these may be problems. As Richard Lowe
>> said, I'm not sure this is a big enough problem to worry about. Its
>> annoying sure, but at the end of the day, its not really that big of an
>> issue. If you care enough about it, feel free to reimplement the
>> functionality in the file from scratch, and then we can nuke the file *and*
>> its copyright. :-)
>
> I checked, and the only change between the logsubr.c file in onnv_137 and
> illumos-gate head is the copyright change:
>
> --- /tmp/logsubr.c_137 2012-02-20 23:46:33.518520532 +0000
> +++ /tmp/logsubr.c_head 2012-02-20 23:47:12.418541185 +0000
> @@ -20,8 +20,7 @@
> */
>
> /*
> - * Copyright 2010 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All rights reserved.
> - * Use is subject to license terms.
> + * Copyright (c) 1998, 2010, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights
> reserved.
> */
>
> #include <sys/types.h>
> @@ -249,8 +248,8 @@
> */
> printf("\rSunOS Release %s Version %s %u-bit\n",
> utsname.release, utsname.version, NBBY * (uint_t)sizeof (void *));
> - printf("Copyright 1983-2010 Sun Microsystems, Inc. "
> - "All rights reserved.\nUse is subject to license terms.\n");
> + printf("Copyright (c) 1983, 2010, Oracle and/or its affiliates. "
> + "All rights reserved.\n");
> #ifdef DEBUG
> printf("DEBUG enabled\n");
> #endif
>
> If we were to completely replace the file with the onnv_137 version that
> might be the easiest way to do it. But, IANAL, it might require two commits -
> one removing the file, immediately followed by one adding the older one (to
> avoid hg generating a diff that is a copyright notice removal).
>
> If people agree this is valid within the terms of the license I don't mind
> doing a webrev + nightly + RTI. But if that's not sufficient then rewriting
> it from scratch can be left as an exercise for someone with more time to burn
> than I do :-)
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------
> illumos-discuss
> Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/182180/=now
> RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/182180/22003744-45f01c1f
> Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;
> Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
-------------------------------------------
illumos-discuss
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/182180/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/182180/21175430-2e6923be
Modify Your Subscription:
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21175430&id_secret=21175430-6a77cda4
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
