Applied social psychologists consider what is best for the group (or
users in this case.)
Do you?
On Jul 6, 2008, at 1:03 PM, Will Evans wrote:
Should there be a natural tension between those tasked with creating
great
experiences and those charged with selling something?
On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 3:57 PM, Robert Hoekman Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Purely philosophical question:
I've been studying social psychology a lot lately, and have become
incredibly interested in the persuasiveness of sites and
applications—how
to
make them more persuasive, what makes them so now, etc. But it
makes me
wonder:
Should the persuasive elements of a site design be left to marketers?
Assuming you work for a company who has a marketing department and
a UX
team
that are separate from each other, how much should the UX team be
involved
in the design of persuasive elements?
-r-
--
~ will
"Where you innovate, how you innovate,
and what you innovate are design problems"
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Will Evans | User Experience Architect
tel +1.617.281.1281 | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
twitter: https://twitter.com/semanticwill
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
________________________________________________________________
Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)!
To post to this list ....... [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe ................ http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe
List Guidelines ............ http://www.ixda.org/guidelines
List Help .................. http://www.ixda.org/help
________________________________________________________________
Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)!
To post to this list ....... [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe ................ http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe
List Guidelines ............ http://www.ixda.org/guidelines
List Help .................. http://www.ixda.org/help
