On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 7:55 PM, Brandon Allbery <[email protected]>wrote:
> On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 7:33 PM, Evan Pettrey <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 7:31 PM, Brandon Allbery <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 7:25 PM, Evan Pettrey <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> The conversation we've been having here is a great example of what I >>>> mean: We've gotten so caught up on whether or not this thing should be >>>> called a "chapter" or if a chapter is explicitly something else, that we've >>>> killed a lot of the momentum behind something that has a lot of potential >>>> to be something great. >>> >>> >>> Seems to me we moved on from that several days ago and are now >>> discussing how to do it in such a way that benefits both members and the >>> goals of LOPSA. >>> >> >> Agreed. Though I still believe it was a valid example of the concern. >> > > I do not. The whole uproar was because the original proposer, and a number > of other people piling on, took it as an attack on the concept instead of > as a specific issue involving the bylaws; once that was clarified and > people started thinking instead of blindly attacking, the problem was > quickly resolved. > > Changes to bylaws will do nothing whatsoever about emotional mis-reactions. > Good point, you're right. It was a bad example. My apologies. > > -- > brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine > associates > [email protected] > [email protected] > unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad > http://sinenomine.net >
_______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators http://lopsa.org/
